I totally understand that there's most likely a way to ADAPT the UC5 components to work in an older vehicle, as I'm sure you guys are going to find ways to make it work. But you can't deny that a management decision was made to not go with a plug'n'play solution. Otherwise, you guys wouldn't need to spend time comparing pin-outs and coming up with ways to rewire everything to make it all work. Did the adaptive cruise control work for an older cruise-control enabled vehicle with a software update, or did you have to replace components and/or rewire? (it goes without saying about adding components if they're not already there). The fact that modern wiring harnesses are typically loaded up with connectors for all of the possible components offered is a management decision as well: it's a LOT easier and more cost-effective to make a one-size-fits-all harness and slip into place during assembly, then simply add the components listed on the build sheet [and omit the ones not spec'd]. I admit that maybe the term 'business model' might not have been the right one to use, because even though they're core components of business models, things to be considered like 'cost,' 'efficiency,' 'profit margins,' and 'management decisions' as motivators of the things done by the Ram Truck Division seem to be getting lost in the translation here.
The things you mentioned that they DO allow to be added-on or backward compatible, do they advertise their availability, proprietary instructions, and parts lists? Has anybody seen a Veteran's Day Special to bring in your old truck to add adaptive cruise control for a blow-out price of just $299? No - because offering a program like that costs money, and they wouldn't make enough back to be profitable.
That mind set is also why it's more expensive to order a vehicle with only a handful of options, rather than a trim package with some options you might not want or care for. For instance, I wanted a brand-new '89 Mustang LX 5.0 'vert I could turn into a Saleen clone for cheap, but all I wanted was cruise and A/C (no power windows, no power locks, no 'premium' stereo I was going to replace anyway, etc.), and it wound up being almost $1000 more expensive than a loaded GT - because I wanted specific things and it would've taken more time to put together a custom package than a car that they'd already made 100 of that day.
Everything is deliberate. Fact: Ram is releasing the UC5 mid-model run, but it will not be backward compatible with vehicles already wired and loaded with the components it manages. The Ram engineers didn't just start tweaking a 12.1 software package, hit a speed bump and say 'Well, Bummer - it won't be backward compatible with the 2019-2021s. Let the Bosses and Advertising know." There were reasons for that... why do you think that is? I'm not saying I have all the answers... not in the least because I'm still new to 5th Gens myself (trading up from 3rd & 4th Gens)... but I'd wager it's still a factor. The Ram Truck Division is not there to be our friends, take care of us, and make sure we're happy - they're there to make money... and talking someone into buying a new truck is a helluva lot more profit margin than selling a UC5 system in the part dept.
You can disagree with my opinion all you like and it doesn't bother me in the least. I just find it disappointing that it's not as reciprocal, as with most other social media outlets these days.
Seriously: good luck with your project. If they wind up offering something better than a 3-band EQ for the stereo, I might just have to bug you for some help to upgrade mine.