silver billet
Spends too much time on here
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Messages
- 2,806
- Reaction score
- 2,760
- Points
- 113
Wow there is so much wrong in this thread. It's a simple fact that turbo engines are more stressed and working harder to produce the same HP, than a N/A engine. This is not a Ford vs Ram issue, it's simply physics. All else being equal, the engine that is less stressed making power is going to last longer.
I'm not anti turbo at all, in a little puddle jumper or cuv they can work great. But in a truck or something that I'm going to work hard and hope to keep around for a while, I'm not going to get a turbo 6 banger if I can help it. V8 all the way.
And yes, Ford feels the same and literally everybody is taking the 7.3 seriously. That engine is just the latest in a war that is heating up in the work truck segment, expect GM and Ram to up the game there as well (without using turbos).
I'm not anti turbo at all, in a little puddle jumper or cuv they can work great. But in a truck or something that I'm going to work hard and hope to keep around for a while, I'm not going to get a turbo 6 banger if I can help it. V8 all the way.
And yes, Ford feels the same and literally everybody is taking the 7.3 seriously. That engine is just the latest in a war that is heating up in the work truck segment, expect GM and Ram to up the game there as well (without using turbos).