Dewey
Spends too much time on here

Firefighters use 36k gallons of water to extinguish flaming Tesla due to battery
Alabama firefighters had their hands full on Christmas after a chain reaction from an accident caused a Tesla's battery to ignite.
Yikes. Someone’s gonna say it’s the same amount of water for ICE vehicles too.![]()
Firefighters use 36k gallons of water to extinguish flaming Tesla due to battery
Alabama firefighters had their hands full on Christmas after a chain reaction from an accident caused a Tesla's battery to ignite.www.the-express.com
Sure EV fires are a concern but shouldn't stop innovation of vehicles even if electric. Oshkosh Truck (who owns Pierce Manufacturing that makes fire trucks and is heavy in govt contracts), is selling the Volterra all electric fire truck to departments (tested in Seattle, AZ, and here in WI). I asked Pierce Reps the same question on how to put one of these fires if their trucks were to start and all I got was "we aren't exactly sure, we never tested for that." How much water you think those would take to put out because a fire truck can never start on fire? Pierce isn't really worried about it and they have a lot of fire department people that work for them (we have several on our department that do). People want the government to not be in everything and then people do want them in things. These goofballs can't even run their own parties so last thing I want is them to have their hand in FD business, we have to deal with NFPA enough on that.
A good friend of mine is a dealer for Rosenbauer, who has some EV fire trucks in the wild already. Word on the street is, they don't like them.
My friend is GLAD he hasn't sold any!
I read where they are starting to carry "fire blankets" to just smother the fire.![]()
Firefighters use 36k gallons of water to extinguish flaming Tesla due to battery
Alabama firefighters had their hands full on Christmas after a chain reaction from an accident caused a Tesla's battery to ignite.www.the-express.com
Firefighting techniques will need to adapt for electric cars. That's why they waste that much water fighting a losing battle trying to us current methods that don't work.![]()
Firefighters use 36k gallons of water to extinguish flaming Tesla due to battery
Alabama firefighters had their hands full on Christmas after a chain reaction from an accident caused a Tesla's battery to ignite.www.the-express.com
Probably would have been something good to test before unleashing this on the country.Firefighting techniques will need to adapt for electric cars. That's why they waste that much water fighting a losing battle trying to us current methods that don't work.
I'm sure that's the first thing they do for every new technology created. Let's test flammability, then ensure every fire department in the country is outfitted before the selling government supported products. How long were petroleum base fuels in use before AFFF was developed by the military to help combat those fires? And there are still fire departments that don't own any equipment capable of deploying foam for petroleum fires.Probably would have been something good to test before unleashing this on the country.
That is just negligence. The cost to add foam capability to firetrucks is next to nothing, relative to the overall cost of said trucks. And as far as testing the new technology for flammability, it was already common knowledge that smaller l-ion batteries were fire hazards...do manufacturers think that problem was magically alleviated by making the batteries larger?I'm sure that's the first thing they do for every new technology created. Let's test flammability, then ensure every fire department in the country is outfitted before the selling government supported products. How long were petroleum base fuels in use before AFFF was developed by the military to help combat those fires? And there are still fire departments that don't own any equipment capable of deploying foam for petroleum fires.
I see you completely missed the point about how long petroleum was in use before AFFF was developed, and instead jumped right to blaming manufacturers for not developing firefighting techniques.That is just negligence. The cost to add foam capability to firetrucks is next to nothing, relative to the overall cost of said trucks. And as far as testing the new technology for flammability, it was already common knowledge that smaller l-ion batteries were fire hazards...do manufacturers think that problem was magically alleviated by making the batteries larger?
Didn't miss the point at all, what you said about the the technology being developed to fight those fires is true. And yes, in the 21st century, we should hold manufactures more accountable than we did 50 years ago. I never said that manufacturers are responsible for "developing firefighting techniques", but I have family and friends who are first responders, and they are exposed to enough unforeseeable dangers in their daily routines. Do you think it is acceptable that they have to deal with highly toxic and explosive vehicle fires that could have had more safety testing done before releasing?I see you completely missed the point about how long petroleum was in use before AFFF was developed, and instead jumped right to blaming manufacturers for not developing firefighting techniques.
As far a AFFF and fire departments, many small town volunteer fire departments barely have the resources to properly outfit the firefighters to offer basic protection for the community. Let alone buying equipment that won't be used much.
My hometown fired departments newest truck is a 1970s military surplus tanker that they purchased in the early 90s using money raised through pickle card sales at the town bar. Which is now closed.Didn't miss the point at all, what you said about the the technology being developed to fight those fires is true. And yes, in the 21st century, we should hold manufactures more accountable than we did 50 years ago. I never said that manufacturers are responsible for "developing firefighting techniques", but I have family and friends who are first responders, and they are exposed to enough unforeseeable dangers in their daily routines. Do you think it is acceptable that they have to deal with highly toxic and explosive vehicle fires that could have had more safety testing done before releasing?
Additionally, I could have been clearer regarding equipment for fire trucks. I certainly acknowledge and understand the challenges smaller/volunteer fire departments face, and they can only afford what is available. I also see some departments spending big bucks on new trucks that could have this capability, but the money is instead spent on other options.
I mostly agree with you, but it's not unheard of the manufacture of a new product to give you instructions on what to do during failure. The EV manufactures just release crap with no standards and as far as I know have not released what to do during an fireMy hometown fired departments newest truck is a 1970s military surplus tanker that they purchased in the early 90s using money raised through pickle card sales at the town bar. Which is now closed.
As you said, first responders are potentially exposed to lots of hazardous conditions in their daily responses. Not all of which can be planned for. There are ways to fight battery fires. Dumping thousands of gallons of water onto a vehicle with a mostly sealed battery compartment isn't the most efficient option. Firefighting techniques need adapted, but that's not the fault of the EV manufacturers. You can't expect company's to not release new products because of low percentage for fires, that fire departments havent bought the best equipment to fight.
I mean, some of the thing he says are along the lines of anti-EV leaning. Like saying they shouldnt puncture the battery box to flood with water because of the warnings in the cars. That warning is there to keep owners or shops from doing that because it will damage the battery pack. If it's already in thermal runaway, damaging the batteries by punching through the box is a moot point
Yeah, Samsung did something, but there have been multiple iphones that have had battery issues, and Apple really hasnt done anything other than release new phones.I mostly agree with you, but it's not unheard of the manufacture of a new product to give you instructions on what to do during failure. The EV manufactures just release crap with no standards and as far as I know have not released what to do during an fire
All I have seen about EVs is you need to submerse the battery in liquid, and you can't lift up a Tesla and put it in a pool.
The manufacture can make slots for fire hoses or water sources to be able to attach during a fire.
Accidents happen with cars\trucks, it's the nature of the beast. There is no reason to now have it planned on what to be done when it happens from the manufacture's point.
Remember the Samsung Note 7 batteries catching on fire that got recalled? I don't know of any other cellphone that can catch on fire. Maybe a bad example but the manufacture stepped up to do something.
The companies making the EV have the attitude of "pay me screw you". They don't care about the consumer and just do whatever to make a quick buck. I remember when Rivian increase the price of the trucks that people already paid and locked their price in saying if they wanted their truck they had to pay more money after already having an agreement. They only reversed their decision because of the amount of backlack and people canceling pre-orders completely.