ferraiolo1
Spends too much time on here
There are quite a few vids on YouTube showing valves of engines who had a can installed and those who didn’t.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My 66 poly 318 has a PCVInterestingly, my 64' Valiant has a PVC system. Then again it was built in the LA plant.
If nothing or very little was ever collected in the catch can, I could see you point. Having owned multiple vehicles running catch cans, and seeing first hand the amount of stuff they catch, I will always use one.I'm totally okay with it. I've seen the inside of engines over 150K, and can tell you that the intake was not high on the list of problems.
Those who think it will make a difference use them.
I've seen no evidence of a significant difference. One part per million, I don't care.
So how would you characterize that? Carefully designed scientific study controlled for all variables, or anecdotal? Critical thinking should be applied. If I thought there was any significant ROI, I'd buy the best on the market.There are quite a few vids on YouTube showing valves of engines who had a can installed and those who didn’t.
Of course it's going to "catch" a bunch of oil and condensate, and make you feel good about how good of a job it is doing. Until you realize that stuff didn't need to be "caught".To think a catch can offers no benefit despite seeing how much they catch definitely isn't a sign of critical thinking
Yeah, I meanz who doesn't like all that extra crap coating the inside if your intake, throttle blade, heads, valves, and burning in the combustion chamber. If I take the catch can off, can my Hemi identify as a diesel for burning oil that doesn't need to be there?Of course it's going to "catch" a bunch of oil and condensate, and make you feel good about how good of a job it is doing. Until you realize that stuff didn't need to be "caught".
There is one downside...it might cut into your beer fund.Lol, I love the spirited discussions on this forum. Everyone feels so strongly about catch cans!
If you're preventing a couple of ounces of oil getting into your intake valves every few months, then it's a win. No matter how you look at it.
I could see some serious debate if a catch can had some kind of downside (like reducing performance, or if they were prone to breakage). But there's zero downside to installing it.
I’m not saying catch cans are a negative thing. Just stating that there will be far different results depending on how the vehicle owner drives. If someone lets their truck idle a lot versus running a lot of higher rpm’s or driving mostly highway miles the benefit will be vastly different in each situation.Yeah, I meanz who doesn't like all that extra crap coating the inside if your intake, throttle blade, heads, valves, and burning in the combustion chamber. If I take the catch can off, can my Hemi identify as a diesel for burning oil that doesn't need to be there?
I know more than a few with well over 200,000 miles on Hemi’s and never had a catch can nor ever even been in a shop for engine issues.
Is it overkill? Depends who you ask. As with anything there are always extremes on both ends of a topic.
Lol, I love the spirited discussions on this forum. Everyone feels so strongly about catch cans!
If you're preventing a couple of ounces of oil getting into your intake valves every few months, then it's a win. No matter how you look at it.
I could see some serious debate if a catch can had some kind of downside (like reducing performance, or if they were prone to breakage). But there's zero downside to installing it.
When you don't have unlimited funds, you gotta put it where it will do the most good...There is one downside...it might cut into your beer fund.