Milage update after 3 months of ownership and 6370 miles. The truck lifetime is 17.8 mpg with 221 hrs and average speed of 28.08 mph.
Terrible! I was really hoping these trucks would be better or on par with Ford and GM in regards to Mileage.
Milage update after 3 months of ownership and 6370 miles. The truck lifetime is 17.8 mpg with 221 hrs and average speed of 28.08 mph.
Terrible! I was really hoping these trucks would be better or on par with Ford and GM in regards to Mileage.
I do allot of city and idling on certain days and then mainly highway on others. I actually believe it is pretty good. My 09 Seirra would only do 19 mpg highway and averaged 14 mpg. This truck has done as good as 24mpg at slower highway speeds and will get 21-22 mpg driving 75 mpg.
I have a similar, but slightly shorter commute (60 round trip, 10 miles in light to stop and go traffic). I can get 21 if I am driving for mileage. Otherwise, 19 is par for the course. What speed are you driving? I've found 68-70 is a sweet zone. 70 and over and the ECO seldom comes on.I have a 110 mile round trip for work everyday. 10 miles of that is light city driving. Every tank so far has averaged under 19mpg. My 5.0 f150 was consistently in the 20-22mpg range with this same drive. Maybe it will get better. I don’t know, I guess we will see.
According to some sources, mileage gets better over time, with 40-60K being optimal in a well maintained vehicle. Wind also makes a big difference in our trucks. I'll be interested to see what the results are, nevertheless.This was my best trip ever with my f150. I’ll be taking this same trip here soon with the Ram and I’ll see how well she compares.View attachment 5287
Any idea , ball park, how much you lose mpg going from 3.21 to 3.92 rear end?What is the final drive ratio in your truck? Note that in "Dkwatts1522" original post above, the signature indicates a 3.21:1 final drive ratio. If yours is the 3.92:1 ratio, we'd expect lesser fuel economy under most conditions compared to the 3.21:1 gears. Of course the towing rating for the 3.21:1 trucks is significantly less than the 3.92:1 trucks, but therein lies the tradeoff: performance -vs- fuel economy.
The Rutter's they just put in by us has non ethonal gasoline.For every 10% of ethanol, mileage goes down 4%. At 16mpg on good 100% gasoline, a typical 10% blend gives 15.36. If you use 15%, which is pump gas here in Missouri, you get 15.04.
My current 20.7 would be 21.94 if we had 100% gas.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen higher then 18mpg with my 3.92 gears and mostly empty as far as payloads lol.
So far that has been my experience too. I just returned from a Dallas area to Austin area round trip and got 16ish on the way down and 18 on the way back. I'm blaming the 3.92 gears since my 2015 GMC 6.2 got 21 down and up several times. I'll take the gears over the miles though
The best MPG without getting run over is rural roads at 55. Here are the results of a study of mpg vs mph of various vehicles. 55 to 60 seems to be a sweet spot. The bottom brown line is a full size pickup. The rest are cars and a small SUV.I had two 4th gen Ram 1500s ( 2010 & 2014 ) with 3.92 gears and was always able to get better than 18 around town. Hand calculated, I hit 24 MPG once and between 20-22 MPG many times on trips driving state roads, 55 MPH. I'm betting you are driving above 65 MPH. Even my 2014 with the eight speed transmission saw the gas milege go crashing down over 65.
Best regards,
Dusty
2019 Ram 1500 Laramie Quad Cab 2WD, 5.7 Hemi, 8HP75, 3.21 axle, factory dual exhaust, 18” wheels. Now at: 003907 miles.
Yea, If they weren't so darn good looking, powerful, fun to drive, didn't have that awesome air suspension and beautiful panoramic sky roof I would have gone with the GMC?