E.Hands
Well-Known Member
This is what I feel as well. Just as in Formula One everything was built on the ragged edge of balance speed vs durability, so to do auto manufactures juggle the cost vs durability equation.The starters used in vehicles with s/s are heavy duty designed for the extra work, and the life cycle is in the hundreds of thousands of start cycles.
Here's an example. Granted this is for Toyota, but the same principle applies. Toyota has a cycle counter built in that will pop a check engine light for starter replacement once it hits that threshold.
To contextualize that number, 384,000 restarts equates to more-than 21 starts every single day for 50 years. Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the starter motors will last that many cycles, but that’s the built-in point when Toyota requires your starter to be replaced.
When the call came for a starter that had a multitude of previous starter's durability, it was easily achieved by sacrificing a little cost to make the compromise. The technology was already in place.