An Engineer's Ultimate Guide To 3.21 VS 3.92 Axle Ratio

[SnowBlaZR2]

Lol

View attachment 121705

Next post
"Well, thats not your dyno"
You experts kill me

Right, so you were full of ****. Again.

 

[BowDown]

Right, so you were full of ****. Again.

Right on que Lol but haters gotta hate

 

[SnowBlaZR2]

Right on que Lol but haters gotta hate

What did you do, round up? That's not how it works.

It does explain why you think your truck weighs 5273 lbs.

 

[TNRamGuy]

So you are turbo, I am really excited to see the pictures of your engine! It is a ton of work to get a 5.7 past 550

 

[BowDown]

What did you do, round up? That's not how it works.

It does explain why you think your truck weighs 5273 lbs.

You weren't good at math were you?

 

[ferraiolo1]

Oh one of those crank hp number kinda guys


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SnowBlaZR2]

You weren't good at math were you?

What's 6900 - 1352?

Because it's not 5273 lol.

 

[BowDown]

So you are turbo, I am really excited to see the pictures of your engine! It is a ton of work to get a 5.7 past 550

ERL 434 stroker, Gwatney Perf Heads and a 242° cam

Wanna Go Fast 1/2 mile race

Modded 600whp ZL1 in Mexico

 

[TNRamGuy]

Lol, 700

 

[BowDown]

Lol, 700

You know 600 wheel is 700+ flywheel right? the math is RWHP / .825 = FWHP

WHP to HP Calculator - Calculator Academy

Enter the wheel horsepower and select the drivetrain of the car to determine the HP from WHP.

calculator.academy

Wheel Horsepower to Crankshaft Horsepower Guestimator

www.mk5cortinaestate.co.uk

 

[TNRamGuy]

Yep 616 =700

 

[ferraiolo1]

But who uses flywheel hp when arguing stats?

That’s like measuring from your taint to the tip.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[SnowBlaZR2]

You know 600 wheel is 700+ flywheel right?

Bruh...you don't have a 700hp car any more than you have a 5273 lb truck.

 

[TNRamGuy]

Although I am still very excited that you squeezed this out of the 5.7 that is not a great engine (I have had 15 or so)they are rough to increase. So turbo? No way you got there with a blower

 

[BowDown]

But who uses flywheel hp when arguing stats?

That’s like measuring from your taint to the tip.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Given most people don't understand rwhp, you need to dumb it down some times and honestly, hp doesn't mean S. Average power and torque are the better descriptors but again, most only understand flywheel hp and my points being proven by hp being the only metric used here

 

[TNRamGuy]

Also assume not nos too tough to see on a dyno

 

[BowDown]

Although I am still very excited that you squeezed this out of the 5.7 that is not a great engine (I have had 15 or so)they are rough to increase. So turbo? No way you got there with a blower

Its not a 5.7. Its a sleeved 7.1 liter block with a callies 4.00 stroker crank, 434 ci. If I did it again, yeah, "id go 388ci and twin turbos, much more livable

 

[TNRamGuy]

What's 6900 - 1352?

Because it's not 5273 lol.

Is it 700??

 

[BowDown]

Also assume not nos too tough to see on a dyno

No NOS although I had a nitrous works 150 with a Nano system assist on it for the street. Never made a dyno run with it

 

[BowDown]

Is it 700??

720 ish at the flywheel on motor, so yes.
A Redeye Challenger would be a better choice at this power level though. This is too much work to make this power NA, a redeye needs nothing but gas and could be at 1000hp with a pulley change.

This car is a money pit at this point, nothings cheap anymore to hold the power or increase the power. Boost is far easier to live with and cheaper in the long run.