Right, so you were full of ****. Again.
5thGenRams Forums
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
An Engineer's Ultimate Guide To 3.21 VS 3.92 Axle Ratio
- Status
Right, so you were full of ****. Again.
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
Right on que Lol but haters gotta hate
What did you do, round up? That's not how it works.
It does explain why you think your truck weighs 5273 lbs.
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
So you are turbo, I am really excited to see the pictures of your engine! It is a ton of work to get a 5.7 past 550
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
What did you do, round up? That's not how it works.
It does explain why you think your truck weighs 5273 lbs.
You weren't good at math were you?
ferraiolo1
Spends too much time on here
Oh one of those crank hp number kinda guys
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
ERL 434 stroker, Gwatney Perf Heads and a 242° cam
Wanna Go Fast 1/2 mile race
Modded 600whp ZL1 in Mexico
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
You know 600 wheel is 700+ flywheel right? the math is RWHP / .825 = FWHP
WHP to HP Calculator - Calculator Academy
Enter the wheel horsepower and select the drivetrain of the car to determine the HP from WHP.
calculator.academy
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
Yep 616 =700
ferraiolo1
Spends too much time on here
But who uses flywheel hp when arguing stats?
That’s like measuring from your taint to the tip.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s like measuring from your taint to the tip.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bruh...you don't have a 700hp car any more than you have a 5273 lb truck.
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
Although I am still very excited that you squeezed this out of the 5.7 that is not a great engine (I have had 15 or so)they are rough to increase. So turbo? No way you got there with a blower
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
Given most people don't understand rwhp, you need to dumb it down some times and honestly, hp doesn't mean S. Average power and torque are the better descriptors but again, most only understand flywheel hp and my points being proven by hp being the only metric used here
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
Also assume not nos too tough to see on a dyno
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
Its not a 5.7. Its a sleeved 7.1 liter block with a callies 4.00 stroker crank, 434 ci. If I did it again, yeah, "id go 388ci and twin turbos, much more livable
TNRamGuy
Ram Guru
Is it 700??
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
No NOS although I had a nitrous works 150 with a Nano system assist on it for the street. Never made a dyno run with it
BowDown
Spends too much time on here
720 ish at the flywheel on motor, so yes.
A Redeye Challenger would be a better choice at this power level though. This is too much work to make this power NA, a redeye needs nothing but gas and could be at 1000hp with a pulley change.
This car is a money pit at this point, nothings cheap anymore to hold the power or increase the power. Boost is far easier to live with and cheaper in the long run.
Last edited:
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Site Vendors
