Maybe you should have read the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act before referencing it.
All I have to say is AGAIN you don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re removing manufacturer installed items without installing a reasonable replacement part and then going to try and say is “All I have to say is Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act“?
Here are a couple excerpts from that
1. The
Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act (P.L. 93-637) is a
United States federal law (
15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.). Enacted in 1975, the federal statute governs
warranties on
consumer products. The law does not require any product to have a warranty (it may be sold "as is"), but if it does have a warranty, the warranty must comply with this law.
The law was created to fix problems as a result of manufacturers using disclaimers on warranties in an unfair or misleading manner.
Notice the last line.
2. Limitations
The Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act does not invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under any other federal law, nor does the act supersede the
Federal Trade Commission Act as it pertains to
antitrust actions.
The act does not invalidate or restrict any right or remedy of any consumer under state law. The act is not the dominant regulation of consumer product warranties, and while it prescribes certain disclosures and restricts certain limitations on warranties, it leaves other warranty law untouched.
[9]
Although the act covers warranties on repair or replacement parts in consumer products, warranties on services for repairs are not covered.
The federal minimum standards for full warranties are waived if the warrantor can show that the problem associated with a warranted consumer product was caused by damage while in the possession of the consumer, or by unreasonable use, including a failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance.
In other words warranty voided by you taking some tonneau cover salesmans word who's just trying to make a sale. You are correct though that they, the salesman or company, won’t have lawsuits against them because they have wording in their sales documents that state “you the consumer(i.e. sucker) release them from any lawsuits because you told them to install whatever it is you the sucker are buying” <— not exact obviously but you get my meaning.
At least I do my research before spouting some random words or facts that make me look ignorant.
I answered your 1st question and you don’t want to accept that, I’m fine with that. So again feel free to do as you wish with your truck. Just don’t come back here crying when the manufacturer laughs you off the lot when you try and spout the “Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act” because YOU voided the warranty by removing an installed support component.
So who is the weird one?
