There's no free energy.
I don't think that's true for anyone with a camper/travel trailer. I rarely tow, but when I do, it's actually for a long haul to take my RV out to remote areas. There is no way I'm going to consider an EV for that any time soon. I would just end up pulling over and using my gas-powered generator to recharge my truck so it can get me to where I'm going, just like the Tesla being charged by a generator in the first couple pages of this thread. I'm not an EV hater, but it's definitely not yet a viable option for a few circumstances, such as towing long distance and, particularly, to remote areas where there will likely not be any chargers for years to come. Eventually, however, electric charging stations will mostly replace gas stations and at that point it will be tenable.I think there a lot of truck owners who rarely ever tow with their trucks and when they do they tow local. For folks like that these tow ranges will be just fine.
When talking about adding alternators to the wheels of an EV to recharge the batteries, it is very true, unless you are coasting downhill the entire time.As a general statement, this is not true.
Everything is free, unless you're unfortunate enough to have a jobThere's no free energy.
It takes energy to make electricity. The energy comes in make forms, and some forms produce more than others.As a general statement, this is not true.
This is probably true for 80-90% of truck owners at least 80-90% of the time.I think there a lot of truck owners who rarely ever tow with their trucks and when they do they tow local. For folks like that these tow ranges will be just fine.
Well, solar and wind are examples of limitless energy sources that are free “to us”….we humans are still just pretty terrible about leveraging them.There's no free energy.
I see you in fort worth..I'm in Hurst..Well, solar and wind are examples of limitless energy sources that are free “to us”….we humans are still just pretty terrible about leveraging them.
But to your point, there is no perfect conversion of energy, let alone any net positive energy generation.
It just takes alot of fossil fuels to harness "free" energy. Also, EVs have 0 carbon footprint on paper because of the lack of tailpipe, but have 12 times the carbon penalty because of the manufacturing process. It takes many many years for the footprint to level out with ICE vehicles because of this. So in the end the carbon emissions are just "moved" to another location, even though the vehicle itself is 0 emission. Kind of a smoke and mirror thing.Well, solar and wind are examples of limitless energy sources that are free “to us”….we humans are still just pretty terrible about leveraging them.
But to your point, there is no perfect conversion of energy, let alone any net positive energy generation.
Not really free as there is a cost for manufacturing the equipment needed to harness the power. And it's still not "free" energy in a sense of not needing energy to make energy.Well, solar and wind are examples of limitless energy sources that are free “to us”….we humans are still just pretty terrible about leveraging them.
But to your point, there is no perfect conversion of energy, let alone any net positive energy generation.
What benefits for towing does an EV give for an equivalently priced gas or diesel truckIf your only metric for a truck being "good" for towing is it's range, then you are missing the piloint
There's a tradeoff, certainly, although it might take less time/miles than you think to "break even" on carbon footprint.It just takes alot of fossil fuels to harness "free" energy. Also, EVs have 0 carbon footprint on paper because of the lack of tailpipe, but have 12 times the carbon penalty because of the manufacturing process. It takes many many years for the footprint to level out with ICE vehicles because of this. So in the end the carbon emissions are just "moved" to another location, even though the vehicle itself is 0 emission. Kind of a smoke and mirror thing.
There is a reason railroads use Diesel electric locomotives. With the diesel engine only supplying the power for the electric motors that actually move the train. I imagine the EV RAM range extender is going to be something similar with a ICE engine only there to charge batteries, not actually drive the wheels. Electric motors just do better when towing. More torque on tap, instantly. Less moving parts, so you aren't losing power through a transmission and differential(depending how the vehicle is set up).What benefits for towing does an EV give for an equivalently priced gas or diesel truck
What metrics show that EVs are better, or can compete with regular trucks. Even a v6 Ram can tow.
A base model F150 lighting with the "pro trim" only adding Max Trailer Tow Package with the 240 mile range costs $51,369 MSRP
If you want the next level up trim XLT with the extended battery for 320 mile range and only adding the Max Trailer Tow Package again it's $84,269 MSRP
You can get a 1500 Tradesman with a 5.7 for $46,590 MSRP
1500 Bighorn with a 3.0 Diesel for $53,355
2500 Tradesman with a 6.4 HEMI is $51,760
2500 Tradesman with 6.7L Diesel is $61,355
I clearly am "missing the point" as there are so many pros and positive "metrics" about towing with an EV.
Save money, tow longer, the sky is the limit when towing with an EV!
I'm just trying to stay on topicAnd you still keep trying to compare two different trucks with different purposes.
It's towing capacity is just as good, if not better than, "comparable" ICE trucks. The only limitation is range. Which anyone even considering it will understand the limitations.I'm just trying to stay on topic
The thread is titled F-150 Lightning Epic tow test fail under the towing section of the forms, so I am discussing towing options
Also you say they are for different purposes, but on Ford's own website that I linked they are pushing claiming the F-150 is good for towing. They didn't include that it's "good for towing light objects short distances"
$85k for a truck is a lot of money if you plan on towing with it and needing to charge every 100 miles. Price creep.
At the current price point this should only be compared to a TRX as a "toy" truck. I don't seem Ram claiming the TRX is great at towing but Ford is clamming the F150 is good at towing when, it's just not.
Such as? Feels like the whole point of the thread was a "yeah but" from "traditionalists". Am I wrong?I just love the rationaliztions and yeah buts from the pro-EV crowd.
I lol'd"traditionalists"