Ram1500rsm
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 121
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 51
They're not race shocks per se so they're not in the performance level with a Fox 2.5 Coilover for example. They have more displacement than a Fox 2.0 CO though so on a heavy truck like our RAM's the 6112's will perform a little better than a Fox 2.0 Coilover. Fox 2.5 CO's have much better internals and will hold up to much longer offroad sessions wishstanding more abuse without fading. Not even talking about adjustability of the CO's That's why CO's are more expensive and better offroading. But a 6112 is bound leaps better than a 5100 offroad.wonder if they're better then the fox shocks. only change is they're 2.5" vs 2.0" right?
Icon makes 1.5” rear springs or you can go with the ORP springs for 1” and there a couple bucks cheaper than the Icons. Eventually my plan is to have the 6112s in front on the 6th or 7th setting with Icons springs and the 5160s. I also probably upgrade to the RC UCAs too at that pointI'm giving the 6112/5160 combo serious consideration. I'd like to get abut 1 - 1.5" of lift for the rear though, to complement the 2 - 2.5" of front lift. Does anyone have recommendations for taller springs? I've emailed Bilstein and they've politely declined to help out with spring suggestions.
If you don't have ORP, then Icon 1.5" or Eibach 1" E30-27-011-02-02 will work out for you. According to Icons you should see a 0.5" more than ORP so technically you'll see 1.5" out of the Icons. The Eibach will be the equivalent of the Mopar ORP, i'd think also with a little more spring rate than ORP.I'm giving the 6112/5160 combo serious consideration. I'd like to get abut 1 - 1.5" of lift for the rear though, to complement the 2 - 2.5" of front lift. Does anyone have recommendations for taller springs? I've emailed Bilstein and they've politely declined to help out with spring suggestions.
I had the Icons 1.5" before the Claytons 2.5" Both seem close in terms of the weight they can support. They're progressive so their spring rate varies with weight. you can't exactly predict how much sag you'll have like you can with linear but as opposed to linear rates, Icon have a much heavier rate than stock when pushed down with load. We don't know how much they need to sag before reaching out that load rate though. We have guys doing verifications around (Thanks to everybody adding weight in the back to test and measuring with ORP, Clayton etc so if you get Icons in your non-ORP truck it'll be interesting to see your lift height, and if you can do a measurement with 300 and 500lbs of weight in your bed, you guys will have a nice reference point with 3 different springs.It sounds like the Icon springs might be my best bet, since my truck doesn't have the off-road package. As long as the spring rate works with the 5160s, they should get me pretty close to what I'm looking for.
I do have about 400-500 lbs of weight (shell, drawers, tools, etc.) in the bed all the time, and I'm looking for better washboard/forest road performance overall. Folks generally seem happy with the Icon springs.
What is the part number on your 6112 boxes? The set I ordered arrived today and it looks like they are part number 24-298810 and not 47-293540.I bought the 6112's for my 2020 Ram 1500 about a week and half ago, and they're currently sitting on my dining room table waiting to be installed. I bought them from a vendor on another forum, and although they were shipped directly from Bilstein, they got here in about a week.
Side note, I'd like to get a set of ORP rear springs to bring the rear up 1", but there's at least two different part numbers for them (68262684AB and 68262686AB). I'm hesitant to buy one without knowing what the difference is. A different spring rate? Does anyone know? Also, when I type in the Eibach part number into Eibach's site, it brings up the part but says "coming soon". I can't find anywhere that's actually selling that part number.
I have the 47-293540 which appears to be correct.What is the part number on your 6112 boxes? The set I ordered arrived today and it looks like they are part number 24-298810 and not 47-293540.