Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
The circular reference math does not exp.ain how you come up with the mystery 8 pounds for the tank......
5thGenRams Forums
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Any Drawbacks to 33 Gallon Tank?
- Thread starter deeve
- Start date
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
Huh.... you missed the range of part above that. I understand. Many here have comprehension issues and like burning cash. Literally since it is burning in the cylinders.
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
It isn't circular. 70 is the anchor point. 70 lbs is the payload difference between a 23 gallon tank and a 33 gallon tank.
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
More likely, merely "satisfactory" isn't something that interests him.
Speaking of comprehension...
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
How do you get to 70 though? You said it is simple math. It is when the base point of 70 is just a made up number pulled from the backside! The only actual number you have is the weight of the gasoline.
It's not like you have 3:21 gears that will get bogged down by 60 pounds. I seriously doubt you count your payload down to the pound. If you do, get a life. It's not a Ford, it can handle it.
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
The difference in payload between two trucks with the same options where one has a 33 gallon tank and one has a 23 gallon tank. Simple math. I suppose you also have to be able to do some basic research, too, so you got me there.
I don't count anything. I pull onto a scale, then...you guessed it, do some math.
Last edited:
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
So, pulled it out of the backside. Got it. Whatever you need to do to convince you. Its all good.
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
It's just finding numbers and doing stuff with those numbers. It might seem like magic, but it isn't.So, pulled it out of the backside. Got it. Whatever you need to do to convince you. Its all good.
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
IvoryHemi
Ram Guru
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2021
- Messages
- 1,532
- Reaction score
- 1,547
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 42
It’s a known figure of +42.8 lbs for the old 32 gallon tank (6g * 6.3 = 37.8 lbs which means the tank itself is ~5 lbs)
42.8 + 6.3lbs (1g) = +49.1 lbs for the 33g (from 26g)
3g * 6.3 lbs = 18.9 lbs (for 23g)
49.1 lbs + 18.9 lbs = 68 lbs
So potentially it’s +2 lbs for 23g to 26g tank weight itself
42.8 + 6.3lbs (1g) = +49.1 lbs for the 33g (from 26g)
3g * 6.3 lbs = 18.9 lbs (for 23g)
49.1 lbs + 18.9 lbs = 68 lbs
So potentially it’s +2 lbs for 23g to 26g tank weight itself
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
You feeling satisfied now? Cause I can go on busting you up all night.
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
IvoryHemi
Ram Guru
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2021
- Messages
- 1,532
- Reaction score
- 1,547
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 42
ferraiolo1
Spends too much time on here
How about most standard pumps will cut off before your 33gal tank is full with todays fuel prices.
And I took an estimated 1lb poop. My payload has now increased.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And I took an estimated 1lb poop. My payload has now increased.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mountain Whiskey
Spends too much time on here
See, this is factual. Good post. What year did they use a 32 gallon?
Is it the same as today's 33? What is the weight of the stock 23 gallon tank? Trying to track down that simple math from Snowblazer.
And who's truck can't handle 60 extra pounds?
doolin64
Well-Known Member
70lbs...I could always leave a kid at home. Or when going with my friends choose to not let my oversized friend come and only take my buddy who's a twig.
33gallon tank was a cheap upgrade an no brainer here. But we have options and that's the great things about these trucks. Build em how you want them.
33gallon tank was a cheap upgrade an no brainer here. But we have options and that's the great things about these trucks. Build em how you want them.
Anarki
Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2021
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 15
- Points
- 3
- Age
- 44
My philosophy for going with a 33 gallon tank was this; I don't have to fill it up full every time I go to the station, but if I have to do a long trip, it is that much more convenient for reducing the stops for fill ups, hence the overall time it takes to get to my destination.
Weight addition for me was a wash as time saved on trips was more important
Weight addition for me was a wash as time saved on trips was more important
SnowBlaZR2
Fuel Economy Champion
I think what's missing is that it isn't just the 70 lbs for the fuel tank. That 70 lbs doesn't live in a vacuum. If I didn't care about payload, I'd have a loaded up Limited or TRX.
I do care about payload, and was shooting for about 1500 lbs for my needs. To get there in a truck I wanted, I had to trim some things I didn't need or that added no value for me. Since a 33 gallon tank is as useful to me as a 70 lb rock, that was the easiest thing to cut.
IvoryHemi
Ram Guru
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2021
- Messages
- 1,532
- Reaction score
- 1,547
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 42
42.8 lbs is the only known figure we have, the rest are educated estimates. The 32g tank was in the DS, I have not seen a similar DT weight spec chart with our 23g & 33g tanks.
Based on the fact that the 32g (+6g) tank is 5 lbs, it seems probable that a +3g difference between the 23g & 26g tanks would be ~2.5 lbs
@SnowBlaZR2 saying 70lbs is a very realistic number as I laid out my math above in post #110
