Idahoktm
Spends too much time on here
I never thought a gear discussion could turn into an oil thread.
I agree 100%. I've never understood the average truck driver that drives like they're in a sports car. You're not. It's not fast. Even a TRX is not all that blazing fast (please bear in mind I come from a background where a respectable quarter mile is high 11's).
Maybe I'm just not in a hurry anymore and I burned it all out of my system when I was a dumb teenager/20 something. I leave on time and get where I'm going early and routinely catch up to pedal to the floor trucks a few red lights later anyway.
I also routinely coax more mpg out of my vehicles than the EPA estimates. It matters to me, especially on long road trips.
Exactly. 3:92's no doubt make towing easier from a dead stop. 60' later the advantage is goneThese rams are mostly a 4 door pickup trucks not a Corvette. You want fast you buy a sportscar. You want fuel efficiency you buy a lil 4 cylinder car. The difference in gears ratios in our trucks is because of towing and hauling capabilities. They arent for quarter mile times. Most people will never use these trucks to their full potential and most of us keep our trucks basically stock so the ratios wont matter much. I get almost the same exact gas mileage out of my 21 BTS with an 8spd and 3.21 gears as I got from my 11 bighorn 5spd with 3.55 gears. Yeah the 3.92 may be quicker off the line than the 3.21 gears but who the hell drag races these things off every traffic they're at?
What's even funnier is the fact the 3.92 lovers think they are far superior at a certain thing when after a certain point there isn't much difference at all. Like someone mentioned earlier, it's like a "which oil is better" thread. And I highly doubt real world gas mileage will be much different between the to ratios either. Who really cares how much more "snappier" one is over the other unless you are drag racing and need to get to the finish line first. In real world driving there wont be much of a differenceIt's funny how "snappier acceleration" = drag racing to the the 3.21 lovers. Good gawd you guys are dramatic.
It's funny how "snappier acceleration" = drag racing to the the 3.21 lovers. Good gawd you guys are dramatic.
The only benefit of 3.21s vs 3.92s is mpg, at the expense of performance. The reason people care about MPG is because of the associated expense, ignoring the hassle factor of stopping for fuel.
It's funny how "snappier acceleration" = drag racing to the the 3.21 lovers. Good gawd you guys are dramatic.
I'm the one that compared it to an oil thread.What's even funnier is the fact the 3.92 lovers think they are far superior at a certain thing when after a certain point there isn't much difference at all. Like someone mentioned earlier, it's like a "which oil is better" thread. And I highly doubt real world gas mileage will be much different between the to ratios either. Who really cares how much more "snappier" one is over the other unless you are drag racing and need to get to the finish line first. In real world driving there wont be much of a difference
Actually one of the main draws for me is that my engine is just idling its way through life. Since my truck lives in 8th, and can do it so effortlessly, what is the point in running around with 400 rpms higher? Just to pull a trailer that weighs 3000 pounds more than my truck can pull but wait only it can't because both trucks are payload limited?
There is no real difference in performance.
Rock crawlers (rebel) and bigger tires are the only real reasons. The rest of you are just burning extra fuel needlessly.
Why stop at 3.92? Why not run 5.10s?
Who cares if it's a 10th slower to 60 at WOT? We can play this game for hours. An engine that spins less lasts longer (all else being the same), that's simply physics.Who cares if its running 400 rpms higher? there's no proof that 400 rpm more, or 800, or whatever magic number it is will prolong engine life.
And performance meaning turning bigger/heavier tires, in the mtns, and not so sluggish from dead stop. I'm not racing my truck and don't care about that.
And you're right, why stop at 3.92s. My jeep has 5.38s in it, massive difference over the 4.10s, or even the non-rubi ratios. It is slow, but you can instantly tell the performance difference it made, on road, not racing.
My point is if you can afford a truck that costs 40-70K, saving a few hundred bucks a year for objectively worse performance (mentioned above, nothing to do with speed or racing) seems strange.
Ok Good for you.I'm the one that compared it to an oil thread.
I care about 3.92 being snappier... that's why I ordered it. I tested both ratios and like 3.92 better. I don't drag race, I just prefer 3.92. It's as simple as that. Why anyone would care about me liking 3.92 over 3.21 is amusing. I never mentioned a word about 3.92 being superior to 3.21 either. All I did was post the reasons I like 3.92.
Who cares if its running 400 rpms higher? there's no proof that 400 rpm more, or 800, or whatever magic number it is will prolong engine life.
And performance meaning turning bigger/heavier tires, in the mtns, and not so sluggish from dead stop. I'm not racing my truck and don't care about that.
And you're right, why stop at 3.92s. My jeep has 5.38s in it, massive difference over the 4.10s, or even the non-rubi ratios. It is slow, but you can instantly tell the performance difference it made, on road, not racing.
My point is if you can afford a truck that costs 40-70K, saving a few hundred bucks a year for objectively worse performance (mentioned above, nothing to do with speed or racing) seems strange.
I would agree with you if those savings were more meaningful, say $1000+ per year, but they aren't.
Probably has to do with the quality of oil used. Let’s discuss.Ever wonder why diesels live so long? Yeah, low rpms
Probably has to do with the quality of oil used. Let’s discuss.