Steelwheelz
Active Member
Any comments on this set up? Doesn’t seem like they change the upper control arms. Link attached below:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Teraflex might be the first to the market with some good aftermarket shock options. Very pricey when compared to a set of Bilstein 5100 but they are a much more robust shock. A comparable Bilstein would be a 6112 and 5160 if they ever release them for the Ram. I contacted them back in October of last year to ask if they had anything for the new Ram which they didn't at the time. Glad to see something should be out pretty soon.Any comments on this set up? Doesn’t seem like they change the upper control arms. Link attached below:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any comments on this set up? Doesn’t seem like they change the upper control arms.
To answer this part, you don’t need to change the control arms with this or any setup where the lift being achieved by preloading the spring/strut (or cycling the suspension. On most trucks anyways.
The control arm issue really only comes into play when you are changing the length of the actual strut itself.
For a quick example, let’s say you have a 20” long strut. It moves 4” up and 4” down all within the stock geometry and the ride height is set in the middle there. Well, you can preload this spring 2”, so now your ride height is 2” higher, but you’ve extended the strut itself by 2” thus limiting the available travel. Now you can only extend this strut another 2” before it’s tapped out. Leaving you back in the same spot as you were with the stock setup, it only extended 4” in total. So your UCA is still in the max droop, you just happen to be riding in a different area of the travel. And there are limits this too, you obviously don’t want to be riding around at full droop. Besides the bad ride quality, your UCA won’t be great there either just because it’s at the very edge of its limits. It’s designed to operate in this 4 up 4 down range, but not to be ran 24/7 at one extreme end. That’s why you typically see about 2” of max lift on this types of deals (bilsteins) and it differs from truck to truck a bit just depending on their geometry limitations.
With a spacer, you add 2” to the overall length of the strut. So now your strut is 22” long, but still has 4” of droop. So it’s no longer in stock spec, the whole geometry has now been changed. You can now basically over extended that UCA by those 2” from the spacer which can cause issues. It starts at 2” droop if you will, and can still go down the full 4” because nothing is stopping it from doing so since the strut doesn’t know it’s now 2” longer.
The aftermarket control arms adjust the position of the balljoint to allow for this extra travel. Or at least that’s their goal.
So same thing happens with a lift kit right, only this time you’ve got a ~6” spacer, you get new taller spindles where they have moved the balljoint again to a new location that will ideally be back similarly to the stock geometry, and then the diff drop brackets for the CV shafts and driveshaft angles.
Long post, but hopefully this makes sense.
Any update on these?
I'm not sure if Icon are popular choice with out trucks, they have different stages available for 5th Gen.
depending on what plan on doing with the truck the icon stage is batter setup. it's a true 2.5" coil over 7/8" shaft with fully adjustable pre-load. Completely rebuildable and the valving can be changed or tuned to suit damping requirements. The falcon is is more of beefier Bilstein 5100 but with 2.25" body and 3/4" shaft but uses the same snap ring style preload as the 5100 but with fewer height options. I've seen the icon set-up priced at 1500 on a couple websites. For the price the icon is a better set-up.I'm curious about their stage 1 vs Falcon's design, seems very close in design, but Falcon has remote reservoir built in for rear shocks and you can change dampening for when towing.
And I think Falcon prices should be in line with their 4th gen kit, which is about 200-300 cheaper than Icon's, but then almost everyone that I know ran with Icon has had good experience with them, hard call.
![]()
DODGE/RAM 1500 | falcon
www.falconshocks.com
I agree that the icon is a better setup but if you have a Rebel or ORG springs, wont it only get you 1.5" of lift in the front? Same with the king coilover setup? So while your actual suspension setup is better all around, you're still not level unless I am wrong here.
depending on what plan on doing with the truck the icon stage is batter setup. it's a true 2.5" coil over 7/8" shaft with fully adjustable pre-load. Completely rebuildable and the valving can be changed or tuned to suit damping requirements. The falcon is is more of beefier Bilstein 5100 but with 2.25" body and 3/4" shaft but uses the same snap ring style preload as the 5100 but with fewer height options. I've seen the icon set-up priced at 1500 on a couple websites. For the price the icon is a better set-up.
What pic?Yea you’d probably need to get a base spring for the rear to lose that inch. The truck that icon posted looked good to me though, I wouldn’t say it’s level but it definitely doesn’t have that over aggressive raked look like they do stock.
What pic?