PorBoy
Spends too much time on here
Definitely let us know your thoughts on the Airflow intake / catback combo.
Definitely let us know your thoughts on the Airflow intake / catback combo.
Dyno results (hopefully) coming to a theatre near you soon. Base line pulls tomorrow, intake plus exhaust install this weekend, post dyno results sometime after Christmas. I’ll try to do as full of a write-up as I can about before & after sound/dyno/mpg as my unscientific mind can produce.
Very thorough report. Thanks for documenting this.Timeline was pushed a bit and got everything installed yesterday! So, as promised, I will try and make as unbiased a review as possible, and one way to do that is to post all the "before" stats now so there are no fudging with results later. Before I get into that, this thing sounds unreal. Still waiting to see if any neighbors DIDN'T wake up at 4am when I pulled out this morning, but on the road it is absolutely how it should sound from the factory. Now onto the review:
Cost
Mopar Ram Airflow Intake (77072428AB)
$770.39 (moparpartssurplus.com Athens Dodge/Ram)
No Tax
Free Shipping
$130 install Cost
$900.39 Total
Mopar Performance Cat-back Exhaust (77072520AA)
$1076.25 (moparpartssurplus.com Athens Dodge/Ram)
No Tax
Free Shipping
$130 install cost
$1206.25 Total
Sound
I will post the videos side by side later but here are the decibel readings (again done on an iphone XS using Decibel X software and not meant to be accurate as to actual DBs but merely show difference before and after)
Recording 12/16/19
Outside: 80.0 Max (55 degrees, 44% humidity, mic centered 5ft from exhaust at 4ft from ground)
Inside: 68.2 Max (0-50mp, medium acceleration, reached over a specific distance that I will replicate after install)
MPG
My commute is 40 miles round trip. The 20 miles in the morning are 5 miles on side streets, 15 miles on highway, zero traffic, 75 mph using ACC. The 20 miles in the afternoon are 10 miles highway, 10 miles side streets, moderate to heavy traffic (15-30mph highway, stop/start, better flow side streets but lots of lights). Then its all city-ish driving around town with moderate traffic at all times and stops/lights everywhere.
Tank 1: 12.3mpg (Hand) and 12.9mpg (Dash) after 31.2 gallons
Tank 2: 12.2mpg (Hand) and 13.0 (Dash) after 27.0 gallons
Tank 3: 13.9 (Hand) and 14.1 (Dash) after 22.3 gallons
This last tank was higher because I had two highway trips of ~80-100 miles round trip each but I included it 1) Because its fair 2) Because my truck crossed 2k miles so maybe this is not a one off but the engine breaking in? Anyways I wanted to lay it all on the table. I also only included the three most recent tanks to try and keep the sample size somewhat clean as it pertains to break-in, driving style, etc but I have been averaging around 13mpg on the dash since I purchased it.
DYNO!!!!
For those of you who are going to DYNO this truck, its not the easiest. The "manual" shift never wants to to stay in gear and the tech has to really work at getting a clean pull without it dropping down. My guys were good and worked at it but it may not always be clean. All of these numbers were done on a Dyno Pack and converted to Dynojet Standard.
Max HP: 350.75 @ 5692 RPM
Max Torque: 377.5 ft/lbs @ 3900 RPM
AFR: Stays at 15 until ~4000-4500 rpm then drops quickly to level out around 10.5. This is where maybe the intake can flatten this curve? Anyone more engine saavy than me want to confirm or deny?
I want the ECU to adapt to the new intake/exhaust and all the parts to break-in (save the you don't need to/do need to discussion please, its also Christmas so not in a rush to get back on DYNO) so will retest maybe in a couple weeks.
So has anyone noticed an increase in fuel economy? Just according to the computer anyways?
Opposite. I noticed a slight decrease after install, which I would expect as the engine is getting more air. Between my BORLA Exhaust, Mopar Lift, 35" on 22's and the CAI - I average around 11-12mpg.
Prior to CAI it was 12-13.
Apparently RAM engineers are concerned with fuel economy too: see active front air dam, grill shutters, 8 speed transmission, lighter/higher strength materials, aerodynamic design...Thank you as if you’re worried that your full sized truck isn’t meeting your fuel goal, time to move on lol.
Lol I’m sure they are more concerned with meeting that “ bonus “ standard but I really could be wrong.
Every bit helps, and I know that no matter what, I will still get 8-10 MPG city (stupid-short commute), and I’m fine with that. It is what it is.Apparently RAM engineers are concerned with fuel economy too: see active front air dam, grill shutters, 8 speed transmission, lighter/higher strength materials, aerodynamic design...