5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Front Air Dam Removal

Eltaco

Ram Guru
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
597
Reaction score
632
After a couple hundred miles driving, I’d say the air dam removal has affected my mpg by 0.5 or less. It’s very minimal, for certain on my Laramie.
 

Jeffjad

Ram Guru
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
1,518
Reaction score
1,258
Location
Southwest PA
f99d492cc5b92ba2dcf744b44454a868.jpg


Love mine removed and have take off for sale if anyone with a Limited wants to drag the ground with it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MBORO19RAM, where did you get the filler caps for the licence plate holes on your front bumper? Looks good, I also have white and want to do the same.
 

dts828

Ram Guru
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
874
Reaction score
498
Location
Atlanta, GA
These trucks look so much better without the air dams, I understand why FCA puts them on as they need to squeeze out every MPG to meet government CAFE requirements but now it looks like a truck not a truck wearing a skirt

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
 

Medgas24

Active Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
82
Reaction score
26
I removed mine also and it looks great. I had it in for some work at a local truck shop that does a lot of sema builds they said that damn it’s the just for air it’s also to help keep rocks from hitting the radiator!
 

Cudapower

Active Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
58
Reaction score
29
I had a 2013 that I hooked a piece of rebar in a parking spot and tore the cover off. I left it off and saw zero difference in gas mileage. I think they are more of an issue than they are worth.
 

Medgas24

Active Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
82
Reaction score
26
Has anyone tried to sell the air damns? After removing it
 

SKT Customs

5thGenRams Vendor
5thGenRams Vendor
Joined
Jun 14, 2018
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,617
Location
San Diego
I just did this to my ram with a 4” lift and I’m not a huge fan of how much you can see the lower control arms and cross member...it kind of looks unfinished I think. Hmmm
 

Attachments

  • 77FDDEF3-A634-478F-ACAC-88F1AF0A1226.jpeg
    77FDDEF3-A634-478F-ACAC-88F1AF0A1226.jpeg
    157.7 KB · Views: 980
  • FD2B6809-E62F-48E7-B78B-2B2D7CAB675C.jpeg
    FD2B6809-E62F-48E7-B78B-2B2D7CAB675C.jpeg
    161.1 KB · Views: 966

Kevin O'Leary

Active Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Messages
60
Reaction score
29
I just did this to my ram with a 4” lift and I’m not a huge fan of how much you can see the lower control arms and cross member...it kind of looks unfinished I think. Hmmm
Maybe trim the bottom part of the air dam to essentialy only keep the rounded part of it? Should come pretty close to covering a good portion of the parts up, while still making it look higher off the ground.

No idea how hard that would be, or if it would look semi decent...
 

Eltaco

Ram Guru
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
597
Reaction score
632
Maybe trim the bottom part of the air dam to essentialy only keep the rounded part of it? Should come pretty close to covering a good portion of the parts up, while still making it look higher off the ground.

No idea how hard that would be, or if it would look semi decent...

If you fail miserably at it, the guy above will sell you a new one!
 

mikeru82

Legendary member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,472
Reaction score
5,114
Location
The Palouse
I just did this to my ram with a 4” lift and I’m not a huge fan of how much you can see the lower control arms and cross member...it kind of looks unfinished I think. Hmmm
I don't think it looks bad at all but it's your truck and you have to look at it everyday.
I agree with Jeff. Looks okay to me. I'd much rather look at the LCA's than a piece of plastic. But looks are definitely subjective, and if you don't like the look you don't like it.

I removed mine a few weeks ago. My girlfriend liked it so much she asked me to remove hers from her Limited too. As far as fuel economy goes, if anything it seems to have improved. When I last posted in this thread I was seeing about 14.5 mpg. Now I'm seeing just over 15 mpg. Could be coincidence as there are only 3k miles on my truck, but I'm definitely not seeing worse fuel economy after removing those ugly pieces.
 

chuckd2017

Active Member
Joined
May 4, 2020
Messages
44
Reaction score
27
Fellas. The trucks look great with the lower valance removed. Adding this to my quickly growing list
 

Stevenc150

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
215
Reaction score
225
Just a thot...I had a '92 Camaro TPI 350 and ripped the air dam off by accident. It would overheat afterwards until I added a new one. IOW, they're not just for mpg...also for engine cooling. The air going under hits it and "swirls" back up into the engine compartment.
Tho with today's engine cooling tech & computerized adv. cooling fans it may not be necessary
 

Jako

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
1,709
Location
Borough of Parks
Just a thot...I had a '92 Camaro TPI 350 and ripped the air dam off by accident. It would overheat afterwards until I added a new one. IOW, they're not just for mpg...also for engine cooling. The air going under hits it and "swirls" back up into the engine compartment.
Tho with today's engine cooling tech & computerized adv. cooling fans it may not be necessary
You have an interesting and good point. I have a Bighorn and I am not familiar with a Rebel but I believe the Rebel does not have the air dam and in addition has some form of skid plate in the front. I have no idea how the engineers designed air flow just more thoughts on the process.
 

mikeru82

Legendary member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,472
Reaction score
5,114
Location
The Palouse
Just a thot...I had a '92 Camaro TPI 350 and ripped the air dam off by accident. It would overheat afterwards until I added a new one. IOW, they're not just for mpg...also for engine cooling. The air going under hits it and "swirls" back up into the engine compartment.
Tho with today's engine cooling tech & computerized adv. cooling fans it may not be necessary
I had a 92 Camaro too. Mine was an RS with the 5.0 TBI and manual trans. Was fun to drive, but I always wished it would have been a TPI. Anyway, the grille opening on mine was pretty small compared with my Ram, and the front license plate blocked off half the opening. Also, the shape of the Camaro air dam helped direct air into the grille, unlike the ones on our trucks. I don't see there being any cooling issues caused by removing it. The fact that the Rebel doesn't have them kind of reinforces that. But I'll keep an eye on it once the hot weather gets here. This is not a pic of my Camaro, but it's very similar.

92 Camaro RS.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top