What's new
By:
5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Freedom Convoy

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m surprised how many responses that clown has gotten when all of his posts appear to be just gas lighting. He’s probably sitting in his mom’s basement smoking crack with Hunter while having a good laugh.
 
SnowBlaZR2 said:
Maybe, but arbitrary magazine capacity restrictions aren't the answer. Pretending that regulation on vehicles justifies regulation on firearms isn't the answer either.

But you know that...

I'd just like you to admit this is more about making sure people can't buy guns you don't think they should have than about anyone's safety. That's what it's always about and you aren't clever or unique in hiding behind kids to push it.
Click to expand...

I think you are wrong......I believe we need further restrictions and you and I will never agree to that.....people will be safer with stronger restrictions. As for gun ownership......you are incorrect......I think people should be able to buy guns....I do.....but capacities should be limitied......I also believe that I will never have my guns taken away......the NRA hype and fear is total BS. Your comment about hiding behind kids is cute......it's like saying the founding fathers wanted us to have unrestricted guns and that they understood today's current issues.
 
HSKR R/T said:
So like I said you prefer only alternative facts that suit your opinion. Any facts that disprove your opinion are labeled "misleading".
Click to expand...
Mirror mirror on the walll.......looks like HSKR has taken a fall.
 
jloops said:
I’m surprised how many responses that clown has gotten when all of his posts appear to be just gas lighting. He’s probably sitting in his mom’s basement smoking crack with Hunter while having a good laugh.
Click to expand...

I don't hang with Hunter or Donny Jr.......both are clowns and do drugs.
 
jerrybob said:
I think you are wrong......I believe we need further restrictions and you and I will never agree to that.....people will be safer with stronger restrictions. As for gun ownership......you are incorrect......I think people should be able to buy guns....I do.....but capacities should be limitied......I also believe that I will never have my guns taken away......the NRA hype and fear is total BS. Your comment about hiding behind kids is cute......it's like saying the founding fathers wanted us to have unrestricted guns and that they understood today's current issues.
Click to expand...
You can think whatever you want, but you have yet to support the assertion that "people will be safer" with something like an arbitrary ban on standard capacity magazines. You're arguing with emotion, and you aren't ever going to convince anyone who doesn't "feel" what you feel. If the statistics supported anything you have to say, you'd have provided them by now.

I'm sure you do believe people should be able to buy some guns. That's why I explicitly limited my statement to "guns you don't think they should have." You're fine with everyone having the guns you have, because you find them useful. You seem to draw the line at anything you personally deem as unnecessary. That's not how our rights work, thankfully.

The Founding Fathers had enough forethought to understand that they needed to remain technology neutral. By the way, I really hope this is where you start rattling off some talking point about muskets or nuclear weapons.

Either way, I'm still not sure why you're on this "unrestricted guns" kick. Are you honestly under the impression that firearms aren't restricted? You sound like one of those people who thinks I can walk into a gun shop and buy a rifle as easy as I'd buy a Snickers.
 
jerrybob said:
Just think how many more people would die each year in car accidents without all the restrictions placed on manufacturers and applicable enforced laws......thanks for making my point.

SnowBlaZR2 said:
Look at you, pretending firearms are unregulated.

jerrybob said:
......but current laws are not adequately enforced and new regulations are needed for sure. The key is enforcement......
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
And the same argument could be made for automobile safety, which was my point. Yes cars are regulated and we're all safer because of it. Likewise, guns are also regulated and we're all safer because of it.
At what point do you stop regulating though? At an all out ban, or so heavily regulated that everyone must do/have (or nobody can do/have) whatever is being regulated? No, that's not the answer either.
I certainly don't think it should be a free for all (with guns or cars). However, proposed regulations on anything should have something substantial to back them. Using the capacity limit as an example. What specifically lead you to believe that limiting rounds will help? Is there something about reload times which would significantly increase a potential victim's chance of escape, is it because you believe the assailant would only carry 10 total rounds, or is there something else? How did you get to the number 10? Was this based on studies that show 11 rounds or more are needed to kill multiple people, or is it an arbitrary number that "sounded" good or was proposed by some other source? If it just sounded good, then that's an okay place to start a study. That would be similar to the government saying they want to reduce the maximum speed limit to 45 nationwide. Why 45? Did a study show 46+ caused more deaths, or did it sound good? Do a study to see if there's some merit to the proposal, but don't snap to that regulation without justification.

I'm not opposed to researched, studied and supported regulations. I'm just saying the government can't control everything, nor should they. Somewhere along the line, that means they shouldn't be imposing regulations.
And to bring the thread full circle for SpeedyV. That includes mask mandates, which is why the convoy and this thread started.

SpeedyV said:
Hey all…I’m just curious how many pages would I need to go back in this thread to find the original topic. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
No need to go back at all, it's been here all along. And now you only need to look up a line or two. :D
 
Last edited:
SnowBlaZR2 said:
You can think whatever you want, but you have yet to support the assertion that "people will be safer" with something like an arbitrary ban on standard capacity magazines. You're arguing with emotion, and you aren't ever going to convince anyone who doesn't "feel" what you feel. If the statistics supported anything you have to say, you'd have provided them by now.

I'm sure you do believe people should be able to buy some guns. That's why I explicitly limited my statement to "guns you don't think they should have." You're fine with everyone having the guns you have, because you find them useful. You seem to draw the line at anything you personally deem as unnecessary. That's not how our rights work, thankfully.

The Founding Fathers had enough forethought to understand that they needed to remain technology neutral. By the way, I really hope this is where you start rattling off some talking point about muskets or nuclear weapons.

Either way, I'm still not sure why you're on this "unrestricted guns" kick. Are you honestly under the impression that firearms aren't restricted? You sound like one of those people who thinks I can walk into a gun shop and buy a rifle as easy as I'd buy a Snickers.
Click to expand...

You make many incorrect assumptions in your post....BTW....thanks for your permission to think whatever you want.......I feel much better. Almost everything you say can be applied to your comments.....you argue with emotion.....you aren't going to convince anyone who doesn't feel what you feel.....you personally draw the line at anything you want......etc.....
As for the founding fathers......how do you know what they thought.....total BS......I believe they were smart men who would adjust their thinking to modern day problems if they were still alive......something you seem to have difficulty doing. I love the Snickers comment......you emotional guy you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Site Vendors

https://www.jasonlewisautomotive.com/

Staff online

Members online

Total: 424 (members: 29, guests: 395)
Back
Top