jdmartin
Ram Guru
The only way you can answer this is just go drive them and see what you think.
Personally:
1. E-torque adds at least a little bit of complexity, so for that reason I would vote no. Every 'improvement' comes with some corresponding consequence. Vehicles are already too complex in my opinion. Anecdotal evidence says they save maybe 1-2 MPG. You'd have to do a lot of driving and gas would have to get real expensive to ever make up the ~$1k on it. If you drove 100,000 miles in 10 years and got 20MPG with etorque and 18 without, and gas was $4/gallon, factoring in inflation, you'd just about be breaking even.
2. Sunroof: I never use them. One more thing to leak on a vehicle. Removes some overhead crush protection in a flip. Chances are that would never affect you but you never know.
Personally:
1. E-torque adds at least a little bit of complexity, so for that reason I would vote no. Every 'improvement' comes with some corresponding consequence. Vehicles are already too complex in my opinion. Anecdotal evidence says they save maybe 1-2 MPG. You'd have to do a lot of driving and gas would have to get real expensive to ever make up the ~$1k on it. If you drove 100,000 miles in 10 years and got 20MPG with etorque and 18 without, and gas was $4/gallon, factoring in inflation, you'd just about be breaking even.
2. Sunroof: I never use them. One more thing to leak on a vehicle. Removes some overhead crush protection in a flip. Chances are that would never affect you but you never know.