BowDown
Spends too much time on here
Agreed that it's probably more attractive to commuters. But even there, can you imagine if you're distracted while going home and you forget to plug it back in? Or you lived in Texas this past year without electricity for a week; sorry boss, can't come into work because my battery is dead. That's why I think it sounds more workable/attractive on paper than if you actually lived with it day in and out for a year. All these little scenarios one doesn't think about until it happens and then it's like "hmm". When I need extra range for my truck I can drop a few gas cans in my bed and be on my way.
I trully think hybrids are the smarter approach for trucks; it gives everybody time to build up the tech, build up the range, the grid etc. We're decades away from a useful electric truck for many owners.
Again, disagree.
I'm going through a tank of fuel about every 8 days, 420-430 miles. I wouldn't even need to charge the truck for 3-4 days.
The only "negative" of the lighting is what you mention, camping or cross country travel but that's not the intention. Let's be real, must trucks are under utilized, especially 2500/3500's.
I see more of those lifted trucks at the gym with street worn off road tires than I see loaded as they are intended to be used, my 700 hp Z06 is more utilized than those and most trucks so I disagree completely on the lightnings limitations.
This truck at 40k entrance fee - $7500 in federal incentives that lower the price and it estimated range is going to change things significantly and I'm not a Ford fan at all