“It was a worthless option in the old days.” Maybe you mean a worthwhile option? It’s true that computer controlled auto braking systems (traction control) do a good job at reducing wheel spin yet one of their flaws is that they don’t allow the driver to use wheel spin to “power through“, or even get any power at all.
Both elockers and mechanical lockers have their place however so do clutch-type LS systems. Here’s a partial post quote from a Subie owner “Interesting…Subaru for years includes the limited slip rear in their Outbacks. When they started to include traction control…I don’t know if they dropped the feature. I do know for “mudding” they are incompatable. You’ll want to spin both rears to clear treads…so trac control is useless and contradictory for true off road applications.”
And another person stated: “Neither system is going to be perfect and neither will compensate for bad decision making. The newer traction systems are designed to help people like my wife and my mother, and for them, it does. For me, it usually puts me into more danger when it kicks in unexpectedly.
I’m not bashing them, but I drive based on past experience before those systems. It was the driver that made the difference. So the new systems often try to counter-act me and that gets me into trouble. The traction systems will not let you apply power to the front wheels to spin them and pull your front end around. It will activate the brakes and put you into a worse push. If I didn’t use those maneuvers, all would be well. But it’s hard to unlearn driving skills and drive like a dummy.”
I think that an ELD is great for deep snow, mud, sand or rock crawling use. The occasional need for additional traction while say climbing a mtn pass in snow at 40 + mph would favor a limited slip, IMHO.
I deliberated a long time when buying my truck on both the final gearing and axle type however considering it was my wife’s vehicle to drive, I mainly wanted 3.21, 4A and the anti-slip options.