5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

An Engineer's Ultimate Guide To 3.21 VS 3.92 Axle Ratio

Status
Not open for further replies.

deeve

Ram Guru
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
608
Reaction score
359
Location
Hillsboro, Oregon
Visit a wrangler forum, especially the JK ones, and you'll find lots of gear swapping going on. Of course over there owners aren't afraid to admit when they make a mistake and fix it. It appears a solid axle swap is also a lot easier.

I did go back and forth quite a bit on which one to choose. The good news is, both seem great options since it seems most everyone loves what their choice is and appears to defend it at all costs. 😂
 

ferraiolo1

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Aug 18, 2021
Messages
2,312
Reaction score
3,605
Location
North Central PA
And yet, no, you have not swapped gears....

Have in the past, yes.

Current truck no, because I bought it how I wanted. But people do still swap gears in modern vehicles.

Can you wrap your mind around that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

m.hamner

Active Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Messages
111
Reaction score
42
I don't know. I just think from the limited exposure I have to the 3.21-3.92 debate, Ram provides the 3.21 stock for a reason and I don't imagine it's because of providing a negligible "savings" of $95 from the "ultimate gearing of 3.92". If 3.92 was the end all be all, I just would think they wouldn't even offer the 3.21 considering the price difference and considering how wide open Ram would be leaving themselves open in customer satisfaction. The 3.21 seems to be good enough for most towing for the 1/2 ton truck. Granted the 3.92 maximizes the max potential towing which is great, but if I'm towing that much where I'd want to maximize the upper limits of the engine, gearing and frame, payload and towing, I'd just want to move up to the 2500 and increase my safety margin.
 

SnowBlaZR2

Fuel Economy Champion
Site Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Messages
2,302
Reaction score
3,261
Location
FL
I don't know. I just think from the limited exposure I have to the 3.21-3.92 debate, Ram provides the 3.21 stock for a reason and I don't imagine it's because of providing a negligible "savings" of $95 from the "ultimate gearing of 3.92". If 3.92 was the end all be all, I just would think they wouldn't even offer the 3.21 considering the price difference and considering how wide open Ram would be leaving themselves open in customer satisfaction. The 3.21 seems to be good enough for most towing for the 1/2 ton truck. Granted the 3.92 maximizes the max potential towing which is great, but if I'm towing that much where I'd want to maximize the upper limits of the engine, gearing and frame, payload and towing, I'd just want to move up to the 2500 and increase my safety margin.
The 3.6L V6 is the standard engine option, but that doesn't make it useful.

Imagine ordering that. Now imagine you did that but with gearing. :cool:
 

TNRamGuy

Ram Guru
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
985
Reaction score
1,215
Location
Knoxville, TN
I don't know. I just think from the limited exposure I have to the 3.21-3.92 debate, Ram provides the 3.21 stock for a reason and I don't imagine it's because of providing a negligible "savings" of $95 from the "ultimate gearing of 3.92". If 3.92 was the end all be all, I just would think they wouldn't even offer the 3.21 considering the price difference and considering how wide open Ram would be leaving themselves open in customer satisfaction. The 3.21 seems to be good enough for most towing for the 1/2 ton truck. Granted the 3.92 maximizes the max potential towing which is great, but if I'm towing that much where I'd want to maximize the upper limits of the engine, gearing and frame, payload and towing, I'd just want to move up to the 2500 and increase my safety margin.
Dude, don't start making sense, we have no reason for it on forums
 

TNRamGuy

Ram Guru
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
985
Reaction score
1,215
Location
Knoxville, TN
Have in the past, yes.

Current truck no, because I bought it how I wanted. But people do still swap gears in modern vehicles.

Can you wrap your mind around that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We're getting a little pissy, and yet, 3.92, still better 👶
 

ferraiolo1

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Aug 18, 2021
Messages
2,312
Reaction score
3,605
Location
North Central PA
If you’re going to play around in the troll thread. At least try and make it some what of an intellectual challenge to play.

Your retorts are just shallow, boring, and lazy. Which in fact, does not rule.
 

TNRamGuy

Ram Guru
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
985
Reaction score
1,215
Location
Knoxville, TN
If you’re going to play around in the troll thread. At least try and make it some what of an intellectual challenge to play.

Your retorts are just shallow, boring, and lazy. Which in fact, does not rule.
Dude, are you really taking this s$$ seriously? Wow so sad
 

ferraiolo1

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Aug 18, 2021
Messages
2,312
Reaction score
3,605
Location
North Central PA
If that’s the best you can do and how you perceived my reply. Bless your heart.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HSKR R/T

locally hated
Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Messages
10,029
Reaction score
9,874
I don't know. I just think from the limited exposure I have to the 3.21-3.92 debate, Ram provides the 3.21 stock for a reason and I don't imagine it's because of providing a negligible "savings" of $95 from the "ultimate gearing of 3.92". If 3.92 was the end all be all, I just would think they wouldn't even offer the 3.21 considering the price difference and considering how wide open Ram would be leaving themselves open in customer satisfaction. The 3.21 seems to be good enough for most towing for the 1/2 ton truck. Granted the 3.92 maximizes the max potential towing which is great, but if I'm towing that much where I'd want to maximize the upper limits of the engine, gearing and frame, payload and towing, I'd just want to move up to the 2500 and increase my safety margin.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with fuel mileage and CAFE requirements.
 

nc_beagle

Ram Guru
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Messages
841
Reaction score
799
Location
NC Foothills
Someone needs to invent a continuously variable rear axle, LOL.

The nice thing about all the love on both sides of the equation is that when it comes time to sell/trade, there's someone out there that wants what we've got!
 

BowDown

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
3,362
Reaction score
3,463
Location
Frisco TX
I've regeared in the past, my old Charger with a 8 3/4 rear three times and my Z06 once but that was a trans re-gear so I could lengthen some shifts , 2nd, 3rd and 4th are very close and hurt my mile an hour in the 1/4 and 1/2 mile runs. I bought the truck this way intentionally, I sought out a truck with every specific option my truck has, even passed on a close truck because of the 3.93 gear.
The 3.21 suits my needs fine and having had a 392 truck and rented a 5th gen 3.92 and a 3.21 truck a 3 days and a week respectively, I don't miss the 3.92. If it works for you, great, I have to drive Dallas to Houston often and driving that drive at 65-67mph to get decent fuel mileage sucks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top