5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

5.7 Hemi - 87 or 89 Octane

derp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
367
Reaction score
193
Location
FL
Complaining at the pump is my god given american right.

pretty much in this priority order:


Ethanol content
price per gallon
octane rating
fuel door on the wrong side for the pump that I can reach today.
fuel tank too small, refilling too often.
fuel tank too large, can't afford to top it up.
Lovebugs.
Who took the squeegee from the washer bucket.
 
R

Rob5589

Guest
Complaining at the pump is my god given american right.

pretty much in this priority order:


Ethanol content
price per gallon
octane rating
fuel door on the wrong side for the pump that I can reach today.
fuel tank too small, refilling too often.
fuel tank too large, can't afford to top it up.
Lovebugs.
Who took the squeegee from the washer bucket.
Wyoming has "blue gas," which is ethanol free.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

silver billet

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,379
Reaction score
2,316
If it did Ram would require it in the owner's manual...so definitely not.

Not true at all. They already give you a warning about it in the manual, but they're not forced to say "required" anymore then they're apparently not forced to make a distinction in EPA certified MPG between a light tradesman and a heavy limited or rebel.

The original point I was making was, even with 85, there was no power or mpg loss.

Not true at all either. There is definitely a difference, the computer will be doing knock retardation and that means a decrease in power. You may not feel it, but it's there regardless. Others like myself definitely feel it under WOT or heavy loads, or even hilly highways. Remember, just because you might be color blind, doesn't mean that red doesn't exist.

To the OP of this thread; it costs you maybe 200 more per year to run the recommended octane, if you plan to keep the truck for a while then it seems like the smart thing to do would be to follow the recommendations of the guys who built the thing instead of penny pinching.
 

doctorxring

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
24
Reaction score
15
Modern vehicles have octane sensors. Burning lower octane gas causes the computer to retard the timing a bit. Hence a bit lower performance and a bit less MPG.
 

parnine

Active Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
147
Reaction score
92
Not true at all. They already give you a warning about it in the manual, but they're not forced to say "required" anymore then they're apparently not forced to make a distinction in EPA certified MPG between a light tradesman and a heavy limited or rebel.



Not true at all either. There is definitely a difference, the computer will be doing knock retardation and that means a decrease in power. You may not feel it, but it's there regardless. Others like myself definitely feel it under WOT or heavy loads, or even hilly highways. Remember, just because you might be color blind, doesn't mean that red doesn't exist.

To the OP of this thread; it costs you maybe 200 more per year to run the recommended octane, if you plan to keep the truck for a while then it seems like the smart thing to do would be to follow the recommendations of the guys who built the thing instead of penny pinching.

The Owner's manual -

Screen Shot 2019-11-02 at 10.38.27 AM.png
 

Amazing93

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2019
Messages
242
Reaction score
184
I'm sure you've probably considered it, but when I fill up at Costco, I blend the 91 with the 87 to get to 89, or close to it. Saves some $ and really no additional benefit to using all 91 that I am aware of.
I do the exact same thing at costco
 

Nick814

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
14
Reaction score
6
I run 89. Gives you no “more” power, but insures the engine wont knock and pull timing. The higher the octane the more resistance to knock. Thats all it is. This way you get the full power i paid for.
 
Last edited:

silver billet

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,379
Reaction score
2,316
I run 89. Gives you no “more” power, but insures the engine wont knock and pull timing. The higher the octane the more resistance to knock. Thats all it is. This way you get the full power i paid for.

This gets into semantics when we talk about "more power":
- running 91+ octane does not give you any more power but doesn't hurt your engine
- running 89 octane gives you 100% of your engine's rated power
- running 87 octane gives you a reduction in your engine's rated power
- running 85- octane will damage your engine and reduce power even further

Some may not notice the reduction with 87, but I definitely do. I also notice when I run gas with less or no ethanol, for some reason it does best on gas with 0 ethanol. My pentastar 3.6 was the opposite, with 10% - 15% ethanol giving me a light surge of power at 2800 rpms and beyond which would not occur with 0 ethanol gas.

Don't know why, and maybe I'm suffering from confirmation bias or something else is going on, but that's my observations.
 

Raydar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2019
Messages
244
Reaction score
130
Location
Carrollton, GA
My opinion is that our trucks may run a bit better on 89 than on 87, but there is no harm in using 87.
I'm basing this on the fact that my truck didn't seem to have quite as much power, "hammer down", when I filled up the tank with 87. I'm speculating that the engine controls detected a bit of knock (long before it was "audible" to me or anyone else) and retarded the spark timing.
So... if you do a lot of passing on 2-lane roads, you might not opt for the cheap stuff. Otherwise - especially if you drive with only moderate application of the loud pedal - it's probably a wash.

With that said, Car and driver recently did a test of different cars' reaction to different octane fuels. One of their "victims" was a lower mile Charger R/T from a rental fleet. Using 87, it was down quite a bit on power, (15 HP or so?) although acceleration was only off by a few tenths. (1320 and 0-60). Take that for whatever it's worth to you.
 

Willwork4truck

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
2,453
Location
SC
This thread can be debated forever. If RAM recommends 89 but allows 87, then feel free to run 87. If in the mts, pulling hard, towing, giving it a lot of throttle, maybe choose 89? If driving like me, or on flatter terrain, towing nothing and having an empty bed, than 87 is fine. I draw the line at 87, won't use 85...
A station down the road has E-15 88 octane and E-10 87 octane. Now I'm no chemist and that choice does confuse me.

I do use Costco fuel at times and happily put in 91 in order to allow a mix of the next tank with 87.
I ran 87 on the highway this last weekend and got about 21 mpg, then I put 89 in on the way back and got... 21. So who knows?
 

RamZone93

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
16
Reaction score
9
Haven't found an answer in the forum search.

Owners manual recommends 89 Octane, but says that 87 Octane is okay also.

Aside from a (potential) slight increase in performance, and possibly MPG - is there any DETRIMENTAL EFFECT to just sticking with 87?

Regards,

Rick
I've used 89 for every fill-up since I got my truck last year. I have 17000 miles on it now. I use 89 just for the fact that the manufacturer recommends it. I'm sure they didn't just randomly recommend it, there has to be a reason. The fuel burns better at 89 and I'm sure it will have a long term positive impact to use 89 over 87. You may not see the benefits now, but you may see them down the road if you plan on keeping your vehicle for a long time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top