Cueva del Osos
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2019
- Messages
- 132
- Reaction score
- 145
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 63
I’ve got the 3.92 axle, Ltd, etorque crew cab. Suppose I’ll get around to the signature block sooner or later.What rearend ratio do you have (don't see a Signature Block on your post?) That makes a difference as well. (compare 3.21 versus 3.92.)
3.21 would get better mileage at say 80 compared to the 3.92 (because the 3.21 RPMs would be lower .. HOWEVER, one also needs to know what RPMs their engine powerband is and Cruising RPMs as well to know which axle ratio you choose. There are plenty of online calculators for helping one decide. Most choose the 3.92 for trailer towing to get them off the line. I chose the 3.21 since I do not tow and plan on making trips back home a few times a year.
Tim N
Just to clarify, I wasn’t bellyaching about the mileage drop with increased speed or about the axle ratio, just commenting on it. I WAS complaining about the poor results provided by certain brands of fuel - whether by refinery design or by station owner practices.
We all know faster costs more...just seems that the hemi consumption curve is steeper than previous vehicles I’ve owned. Again, not complaining, i really like this truck...I just use this aspect to help keep my own driving at a balance of speed, performance and cost that works best for me.