And yet, the bracea live at the top of the bed, not at the bottom where a lowered tailgate would still provide structural stiffness. I would think the only time a tailgate provides stiffness at the top is when it's closed. And, the tailgate is attached at the bottom the entire length of the bed.
Of course, I could be entirely wrong.
I was simply responding to the “tailgate down vs removed” comment. But yes, of course, the tailgate provides no support at the top of the rails when it’s down.
Back on point...
The function of the braces makes perfect sense, as the ability to open the split tailgate via side-mounted hinges can create a rotational moment in the horizontal axis that doesn’t exist with a standard tailgate, coupled with a significant lateral load on the bed sides.
I disagree with the earlier comment that “...the brackets are for when the tailgate is closed.” I don’t read that at all in the FCA engineer’s comments, and I think that’s the least “vulnerable” scenario from a structural standpoint.
Rather, the engineer appears to confirm that the bed sides lack sufficient lateral load capacity to handle these forces without an unacceptable amount of deflection and/or potential fatigue/failure. The braces, while small, add stiffness by reducing the effective length of the bed sides and coupling them to the front of the bed.
(FWIW - my first master’s degree was in structural dynamics. But I could still be wrong.)