5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Which setup for best MPG on the Hemi

Willyq711

Member
Joined
May 27, 2024
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Hey all,

Looking at two preowned non-etorque Hemi's, both 2019's (Longhorns). I'm looking to get some feedback on which of these will give better gas mileage....

1. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 2x4 with 3.92 axle.

2. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 4x4 with 3.21 axle.

Most of my driving is 50/50 city/hwy and very little towing, if any. I do drive spirited at around 80+ on the Hwy.

The question here bis what's more beneficial for fuel economy... The weight savinga and lesser drive train work of the 2x4, or the lower gear ratio?

Thanks.
 

vincentw56

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
2,355
Hey all,

Looking at two preowned non-etorque Hemi's, both 2019's (Longhorns). I'm looking to get some feedback on which of these will give better gas mileage....

1. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 2x4 with 3.92 axle.

2. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 4x4 with 3.21 axle.

Most of my driving is 50/50 city/hwy and very little towing, if any. I do drive spirited at around 80+ on the Hwy.

The question here bis what's more beneficial for fuel economy... The weight savinga and lesser drive train work of the 2x4, or the lower gear ratio?

Thanks.

2x4s are for wood. 4x2s is for trucks.

Number 2 would probably give the best. But keep in mind you are probably only going to see a 1 or 2 MPH difference.
 
Last edited:

irishwake63

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2023
Messages
325
Reaction score
191
if ya want a good 4x4 get a Jeep if ya want a gas efficient vehicle get a Prius if ya want a truck that will tow more get the 2X4 3:92
 

Scram1500

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
3,200
Reaction score
6,622
If you travel at 80+ the 3.21 will get the better mileage even with 4x4. That said the 3.92 2x4 would be a blast, unless it doesn't have limited slip then you could be gimped by wet grass
 

Richard320

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
2,140
Reaction score
2,276
Location
LA County, People's Republic of California
I would guess it's gonna be a tossup.

I have 4x4 3.21. It's what I wanted because I anticipate moving somewhere with 80 mph speed limits once the wife retires. However, sometimes I get to drive that fast locally, and the truck will downshift on a 4% grade when I'm going 75-80. There's a post here that explains the math. 7th gear w/3.21 is the same RPM as 3.92 in 8th. So I haven't gained anything with the 3.21.

Your 50% city driving will benefit from the lower gears, because 3 tons is a lot of weight to get moving.

Where I have seen great fuel economy is on long drives on two lane highways or where the road is really flat. Then it's easy to get 21-22 mpg, so long as you keep the speed below 70.
 

jkm312

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
281
Reaction score
274
I have a 19 Laramie 4 x 4 with a 3.92 rear end. I ordered it that way on purpose. What I have found there is less gear shifting with the 3.92 when you are cruising down the highway, it stays in 8th gear most of the time when driving thru the rolling hills here in the midwest. When it does drop a gear or two on a grade it is always nice and solid. Drove it to the Carolina's and outer banks, it went right on by lots of cars and trucks thru the mountains in West Virginia and Virginia. I was in the 19 to 20 MPG for the trip, good enough for me. Running in town the MDS will stay on a little bit more than the 3.21.

What does matter more than you think are the size, weight and air pressure of the tires you are running , coupled with how much lead is embedded in your right foot. It's a truck, it's going to burn some gas, end of story.
 

scottmoyer

Ram Guru
Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
992
Reaction score
975
Please refer to this correctly. As stated, a 2x4 is a piece of lumber. 4x2 and 4x4 are proper terms for vehicles as the first number designates the number of wheels and the second number denotes how many are drive wheels
 

1923bob

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
217
Reaction score
137
Location
Poway,Ca.
Hey all,

Looking at two preowned non-etorque Hemi's, both 2019's (Longhorns). I'm looking to get some feedback on which of these will give better gas mileage....

1. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 2x4 with 3.92 axle.

2. 2019 Longhorn, Hemi non-etorque, 4x4 with 3.21 axle.

Most of my driving is 50/50 city/hwy and very little towing, if any. I do drive spirited at around 80+ on the Hwy.

The question here bis what's more beneficial for fuel economy... The weight savinga and lesser drive train work of the 2x4, or the lower gear ratio?

Thanks.
I have 3.21 works great.
 

Willwork4truck

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
3,823
Reaction score
2,632
Location
SC
Just about all the posts above reflect my experience. I had a 2019 4x Ltd with stock 22's and 3.21 non-et. Best highway at 70 was touching 22. Most any smaller hill dropped me out of 8th.

Now I have a 23' Ltd 4x (basically the same truck) except it has the 3.92's. At the same speeds highway I get 20.5-21, no better. Slight hills it stays in 8th.

Around town there's probably no observable differences.

Buy the truck you like for its' overall condition, miles and options. Don't sweat the gears unless you tow, and then the low payloads hamper you with the higher trim RAM like a Longhorn.

Sure I'd like the 3.21 mileage again but I also like the 3.92 on hills.
If I lived in hilly/mountain country I'd stick with 3.92's.
Flatland? 3.21.
Tow much of anything (north of 6K GVW trailer) then 3.92's.
Tow heavy (8K or more trailers)? 2500 gasser long bed.
(I'm not into the cost and maintenance of diesels but understand why peeps like them.)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top