Fishwiz
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2020
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 146
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 38
I'm not claiming you're wrong (in fact, you're probably right)... But there's one thing that doesn't appear to be included in your thinking: residual value.Plenty of posts about it and I know I provided in-depth analysis but there is really only a few very specific circumstances where an ED MIGHT make sense. It costs $3K more than the eTorque HEMI and $3200 more than the non-eTorque. Diesel fuel (in most cases) is more expensive as is the maintenance (oil changes, DEF, etc.). I always love when people think they love that they're "saving" money on fuel when they look at their MPG but ignore the up front cost difference, interest (if not paying in full with cash), increased maintenance etc. I drive 20K a year and I would have never broken even with an ED so it was an easy choice to make. Enjoy your truck!
The ED costs more up front, but it retains some of that value a handful of years later when you sell the truck. This will effectively reduce the cost of the ED option and then your fuel savings will break even sooner than you suggest.
I still think the ED is a choice that works for only the "right" person and situation. My original comment was more of an emotional comment to give credit to the post i replied to (he's happy with his mpg, and I'm glad he's enjoying his truck) and to express my current disappointment with my mpg. I'm coming from an f150 3.5 ecoboost.... I was used to plenty of power and reasonable mpg. This will take some time to get used to (5mpg lower is a substantial difference, especially considering I didn't gain a huge power increase for that cost). In know there are lots of ecoboost vs hemi posts too, and many hemi guys knock on the little boosted motors and ecoboost drivers... But those ecoboosts clearly perform well for many people and I don't think they are going away any time soon (until everything is electric or hydrogen).
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk