FirstTimeRamDriver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 249
- Points
- 43
I would have to agree, Toyota Tundra has not had a complete makeover since 2007. A lot has changed since then. Trucks need to keep pace. Thats exactley why The Silverado is number three in sales now. And Ford is scrambling to complete an remake of there interior on the F150.I traded a 2015 Tundra in for my Ram, no regrets. The interior is what got me to switch, I looked at the new Tundras and they still looked the same, disappointing. A Ram dealer was close by and the rest is history.
That's true, but I find payload to be the weakpoint of the half-ton market. The gearing, even the 3.21s, seem to pull loads up to payload just fine. 4.30s would surely be better, but those also contribute to Toyota having worst in class mileage not loaded.Tundra also has 4.30 gearing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tundra also has 4.30 gearing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Tundra runs 3.333:1 first gear versus a 5:1 first gear and 3.20 second gear on the Ram. 14.319 gear reduction on the Tundra versus 19.6:1 on the Ram with 3.92 rear end and 16.05:1 for the Ram with 3.21 rear end. The rear end on the Tundra is hell for stout though with a 10.5" ring gear.That's because they only have a 6 speed. With more gears available, you can reduce the gearing. I haven't looked it up, but these sorts of comparisons always comes up on various forums and when then the local forum engineer drops in and does the math, they end up with pretty much equivalent gearing at the wheel.
I test drove a 2019 Tundra the other day just to see...It was not even close to the Ram. Noise, ride, transmission, it was all worse in the Tundra. I know, I know, it's about the Toyota reliability. It should be; I felt like I was in 2007 sitting in the Tundra. They should have all the kinks worked out by now.