BlueStreak19
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2019
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 3
- Age
- 46
During my search and eventual ordering of my new 2019 I searched high and low for someone to compare the 3.6L with the previous generation and could not find it. Now after having the new generation for a short time I would like to share my initial thoughts coming directly from a Gen 4 to a Gen 5 Pentastar. Let me start by saying I have bought new ram trucks since the Gen 2's came out in the mid 90's with almost every driveline combination possible and the level of refinement in the powertrains and truck as a whole over this time is stunning to say the least. My last to trucks were a Gen 4 5.7 Hemi, then most recently a Gen 4 3.6L. The 3.6L was a 4X4 Crew Outdoorsman with a 3.21 axle ratio. What pushed me to the Pentastar in the first place was looking for better efficiency in everyday driving as my truck is unloaded 90% of the time and the heaviest trailer I own is 3K lbs, well within reach of this set up. After 3 years of ownership that set up returned an average of 18mpg averaged over it's entire life. That is hand calculated at every fill up not based on the invacuate lie-o-meter as most of you call it. Best tank was 24.6 worst was 13.4. I realized a 4 mpg real world difference across their lives in Gen 4 trucks between the 5.7L and the 3.6L. That truck handled any and everything I asked of it and took it in stride. That truck delivered everything I needed so now when it was time for a Gen 5 the capability with the Pentastar never came into question for me. Enough of the past, lets get on the the good stuff. My gen 5 is a Loaded 4x4 Laramie crew so it is a very heavy truck, I imagine that many Pentastars find their way into tradesman models with a lower curb weight so this should be the ultimate test for this powertrain. The single biggest difference I immediately notice with the Gen 5 is how torquey it feels during "normal" driving. Guys get hung up on 0-60 times and such but I'm to the point where real world driving impression is much more important. I can't put my finger on why the engine seems to have more usable torque if its the e-torque, the change to a 3.55 axle gear, or the upgrades to the base engine with variable valve lift etc. The power feels similar to the Magnum V8's of years past. It will never hold a candle to the 400 horsepower trucks of today, but delivers more than enough power and capability for most 1/2 ton pickup owners. Wide open throttle and highway passing performance from the seat of the pants seems to be the same if not slightly improved. I haven't put enough miles on yet to get a good read on fuel economy yet but I will add updates as they come. For what it's worth the lie-o-meter has been hanging around 16.6mpg half way though the first tank of fuel and it has been extremely cold so I use the remote start every day. So stay tuned. The whole reason I posted this is I feel that there are other Pentastar fans out there in the same boat I was, and all I can say is if you were happy the Gen4 you well be thrilled with the Gen 5. This engine is very capable but largely gets looked over by it Hemi big brother. Thank you FCA for making the Pentastar available across all trim lines. Even though it is not your volume seller us Pentastar fans appreciate it. The only thing I do miss form the Hemi is the sound, but if a guy can get over that the Pentastar is a very capable choice. Last but not least one other thing that I have never seen anyone talk about is the difference in handlining. Not that a pickup is a sports car but with the smaller engine the handling of these trucks seems so much more responsive. I would attribute this to the lighter front end weight thus better weight balance. Maybe that is something only someone who has spent a lot of time with both setups would notice. Anyway thanks for reading my rant and I hope someone find this helpful. I will add updates as appropriate. Cheers!