5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nitrogen vs Regular Air

Rlandon

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Messages
87
Reaction score
46
Location
Panama City FL
Is there any real difference between the two other than one having a lower weight than the other? They both fill a tire. I have nitrogen in my Nitto's which was there when I purchased the truck. I wanted to add a pound or two of air and test out the Ram air pressure horn signal and lights (yes they both work I found out later). I'm not in a mid to large city so it's not easy finding a source. Thinking of purging the nitrogen and just going to regular air. Talk me out of it and why.
 

Ratchet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2021
Messages
220
Reaction score
193
Location
Wilson, NC
A friend sent me this years ago.

What do we know or can we reasonably infer about nitrogen inflation?

1. According to NHTSA, nitrogen filled tires (N) lose 1.4% of their pressure per month on average compared to 1.8% for air filled tires (A). Using those values, the difference between a N and an A after a year is 1.3 psi (the same number arrived at by the CR study) if neither tire is topped-off during the year. Obviously, frequent top-offs are required by both N and A. As far as pressure retention is concerned, this proves that there is a slight, but relatively insignificant advantage to N.

2. According to both NHTSA and Ford(Baldwin), there is a net inward permeation of oxygen in N. Significant permeation occurs within 90 days in static tests. According to NHTSA, both in the lab and on the road, oxygen permeates outward faster than nitrogen in A leading to a significant enrichment of nitrogen in A. This inward and outward permeation will continue until chemical equilibrium is achieved. It is reasonable to assume that such equilibrium will occur between 3 months and a year such that the gas in a N and an A will have near identical chemical compositions by that time. So, once equilibrium concentrations are established (within 1 year) there is no difference between N and A from then until the tire is replaced.

3. Because water vapor permeability is 80 times that of oxygen, water vapor concentration will also equilibrate in a manner similar to oxygen in 2, above.

4. The thermophysical properties of dry air and nitrogen are nearly identical. In the operating envelope of the average passenger car tire, both gases may be treated as ideal gases. Water vapor has a much higher heat capacity, but it too may be treated as an ideal gas. Further, it is a tiny component of the gas mixture. Within the operating regime of the average passenger car tire, the water vapor does not significantly effect tire temperature, pressure, or any other parameter. So, there is no physical reason that the two gases should influence either the handling or ride comfort of a vehicle. If, someone's calibrated rear end were somehow sensitive enough to detect a difference, then from 2 and 3, above, that difference should disappear sometime within a year.

5. According to NHTSA, there is no difference in rolling resistance between N and A. This strongly implies that there should be no expected difference in gas mileage between N and A. The conclusion of 100% of the existing literature is that if tire pressure is maintained, there is no difference in mileage between N and A. Tire pressure is the only determinant, all other things being equal.

6. Ford(Baldwin) and NHTSA have shown that a 50/50 mix of nitrogen and oxygen baked in a tire at 65C for 5 - 12 weeks (with O2 replaced as permeation occurs) will produce oxidation damage to a tire equal to 6 - 8 years in Phoenix, AZ or 8 - 12 years in the northern part of the Country. The NHTSA has reported that the average passenger car tire is replaced due to wear at 3.6 years. What does this mean? It means that oxygen does indeed cause damage to tires if given enough time and temperature. It also means that tires wear out long before oxidation becomes a significant factor. Average passenger car tire life is clearly independent of oxygen content inside the tire and the slow oxidation reaction that occurs.

7. Exterior tire sidewall damage is due to reaction with ozone, UV irradiation, abrasion due to a variety of road hazards, and to some degree inward oxygen permeation. Tread wear is due entirely to friction contact with the road surface and varies with driving style, road surface (friction coefficient), temperature, tire pressure, wheel alignment, suspension repair & tune, wheel balance, and other factors. The interior fill gas has no bearing on exterior sidewall life or tread wear other than the pressure it exerts.

8. New tire materials and manufacturing processes have been developed over the past decade of so that even further minimize any differences that one might expect between A and N.

The overwhelming conclusion to be drawn from the above, is not only is there no economic reason to fill average passenger car tires with nitrogen, but there is no compelling reason to fill average passenger car tires with nitrogen even if you can get it done free.
 

mtnrider

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
39
Reaction score
33
The only benefit is they maintain pressure over temperature swings. Regular air has worked for ages and much easier to deal with if you need to add some. I thought the nitrogen fad had passed a few years ago?

.
 

Shots

Ram Guru
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
736
Reaction score
727
Location
N.E. Ohio
I just bought a set of Rebel wheels/tires to replace my stock set. The guy I got them from had them Nitrogen filled. I can't tell any difference at all from any tire I've run with air.

All the articles I could find simply said Nitrogen filled will loose pressure slower (via permeation not a hole) and they are slightly less reactive to temperature changes.
With that said, a tire increasing/decreasing 2 psi because it's hot/cold isn't an issue on truck. On a racecar maybe, but I wouldn't pay extra to put it in a truck tire. If it's already there (such as in my case) I'm not going to bother replacing it with regular air but I see no advantages/disadvantages to either on a typical vehicle.
 

Rlandon

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2021
Messages
87
Reaction score
46
Location
Panama City FL
Thanks all. I'll leave it be for now. All have good pressure but should I need to add more later the tires are going back to plain ol' air!
 

HSKR R/T

locally hated
Site Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Messages
9,924
Reaction score
9,754
There is no reason you can't refill or "top off" with regular air. As mentioned, the regular air out of the compressor is 78% nitrogen already. You will not notice any difference.
 

Nukegm426

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Messages
269
Reaction score
167
What’s funny is most of the time even when you pay extra for nitrogen they just put green caps on and call it a a day. The tires are mounted and then pressurized to seat the beads with shop air, if your lucky and it’s on the ticket they may let some of that air out... but they usually just change the caps and or finish the tire fill with nitrogen. But usually the nitrogen is on a cart across the shop stored against the wall. And it’s time consuming to bring it over then put it back when your done... and the guy doing your tires is usually paid by the job not by the hour.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top