First of all, thank you for your service with the NYC FD. I have tremendous respect for first responders. Most people do not give the respect and acknowledgement due to FRs and LE.
“Whether it is VW or the testing procedure the result is the same that the MPG is better than quoted” . True, but just emphasizes my point that consumers don’t really know what numbers to expect regarding fuel economy.
My Ram can average over 20 on the hiway with reasonable foot control, not a fan of the adaptive cruise control, but still reasonable for a heavy V8.
"don’t really know what numbers to expect regarding fuel economy."
Well that seems to be the scenario for the same vehicle. It seems some are not happy with their Ram's mpg versus what it is rated.
I checked my Ram's mpg and the lowest I have is 3 tanks less than 11 mpg (none below 10) in 22,000 + miles and have exceeded the hwy mpg on several occasions. Overall for 22,495 miles I have 16.6 mpg, while it is rated at 17 mpg. I'll blame the .4 on living with NYC stop and go traffic, 10% ethanol, winter gas blend and just winter cold temperatures with short trips (Ram's hungry if cold).
Viewing some of the driving habits I see locally along with driving conditions there is no way some can come close to the advertised mpg.
Looking at info from my 2001 Dodge SLT 1500 out of the first 74 fill ups I have 6 over 16 mpg (none at 17) with it rated at 16 mpg hwy.
In general I would say that I do not expect to get the mpg advertised all the time but it is attainable depending on a lot of the "right" conditions or I should say similar to test conditions. I will never get the advertised city mpg as testing conditions and my driving conditions lack correlation but I can still use advertised mpg for comparison and I believe very few will be over as per the Tiquan.
No explanation for the variance in mpg for similarly equipped Rams.