So just like any automotive forumI mean, go over to the Wagoneer forum and click on the "problems/issues/TSBs" section. HOURS and HOURS of reading. It's a disaster. That vehicle (based on Ram 1500 largely) got the engine first.
So just like any automotive forumI mean, go over to the Wagoneer forum and click on the "problems/issues/TSBs" section. HOURS and HOURS of reading. It's a disaster. That vehicle (based on Ram 1500 largely) got the engine first.
i have to respond.
yeah, lot's of high mileage turbos' but they are not hurricanes......not bashing just speaking from my actual experience i have had turbo cars.
we went through this before diesel turbo yeah great! gasoline not so much.
according to google AI lol the highest mileage hurricane RAM has 44k on it.
it's a cliché but it hold's true "the light that burns twice a bright burns half as long" the new wave of turbo 2.0's and 1.5's 4 bangers won't hold up long term either they are not meant to, let's be clear the manufactures want you buy cars/trucks every few years they only care that it makes it past the warrantee. but 2026 RAM 10 year 100k is promising if they stay in business that much longer.
there are many hemi's with well over 200k and i'll eat humble pie if the hurricane get's anywhere near that point.
with millions of hemi's on the road yeah you have some hemi's with issues but percentage wise not huge even when you factor in e-torque.
i hope i'm wrong about the I-6, time will tell.
i am biased as a whole i am anti turbo no matter what I-6, V6, V8, 4 banger hell even 3 banger. NA all the way
Well we've already seen:
- 14 hours of labor to change a simple water pump (!)
- Exhaust routing on some models won't even allow for transmission fluid/filter changes, which means people just won't do it, which means shorter trans life
- Timing jobs are a nightmare
- Electrical issues galore
I mean, go over to the Wagoneer forum and click on the "problems/issues/TSBs" section. HOURS and HOURS of reading. It's a disaster. That vehicle (based on Ram 1500 largely) got the engine first.
So yeah, if it's that bad early on (which is to be expected with an overly complex design from Europe) then you can easily guess how it's going to be at 100k, 150k, or beyond. Good luck.
No, fuel economy isn't slightly better. EPA cert only pegged it at 1 MPG better, but in the real world guys are finding that it's worse, which is typical of small turbo engines. Check out Getty's Garage....he's tested them all and the Hurricane is at the bottom of the list.
It's a plug and play tuner that they make for many different manufacturers --- gas mileage unchanged -- since it's plug and play, you just remove it (unplug) it from your vehicle without a trace.Been seeing various references to "tuner". Is this specific to the Hurricane engine?
Does adding a tuner kill the expected gas mileage?
Assume you remove the tuner when taking the truck in for service to avoid them from voiding any warranty?
Back on topic....
I have been loitering on this board for a while, researching for when my truck goes belly up.
Since I tend to keep vehicles as long as it reliable, I have been fighting a similar scenario.
With longevity in mind, the Hemi has its own list of well know potential issues and including the etorque system increases them.
The Hurricane has its own concerns.
Not sure what to do so I asked Grok to compare turbo and non-turbo engines.
On average, non-turbo engines may last 20–50% longer than turbo engines under similar conditions. For example, a non-turbo engine reaching 250,000 miles might outlast a turbo engine by 50,000–100,000 miles. However, modern turbo engines (e.g., those from BMW, Ford, or Volkswagen) with advanced materials and proper care can narrow this gap.
I'm sure there are lots of higher mileage Grand Wagoneer's out there since they've been out since '22 and they have the same hurricane engine. I haven't heard of any real (widespread) issues.i have to respond.
yeah, lot's of high mileage turbos' but they are not hurricanes......not bashing just speaking from my actual experience i have had turbo cars.
we went through this before diesel turbo yeah great! gasoline not so much.
according to google AI lol the highest mileage hurricane RAM has 44k on it.
it's a cliché but it hold's true "the light that burns twice a bright burns half as long" the new wave of turbo 2.0's and 1.5's 4 bangers won't hold up long term either they are not meant to, let's be clear the manufactures want you buy cars/trucks every few years they only care that it makes it past the warrantee. but 2026 RAM 10 year 100k is promising if they stay in business that much longer.
there are many hemi's with well over 200k and i'll eat humble pie if the hurricane get's anywhere near that point.
with millions of hemi's on the road yeah you have some hemi's with issues but percentage wise not huge even when you factor in e-torque.
i hope i'm wrong about the I-6, time will tell.
i am biased as a whole i am anti turbo no matter what I-6, V6, V8, 4 banger hell even 3 banger. NA all the way
I got one of the early builds. April of 2024 and have had 0 electrical issues.With all the comments on electrical/software issues, if getting a 2025 build, is there a build date after which you are safe from some of these gremlins? I might get a 2025 based on being able to get better pricing if you take a 2025 off the lot today.
540 > 395Well we've already seen:
- 14 hours of labor to change a simple water pump (!)
- Exhaust routing on some models won't even allow for transmission fluid/filter changes, which means people just won't do it, which means shorter trans life
- Timing jobs are a nightmare
- Electrical issues galore
I mean, go over to the Wagoneer forum and click on the "problems/issues/TSBs" section. HOURS and HOURS of reading. It's a disaster. That vehicle (based on Ram 1500 largely) got the engine first.
So yeah, if it's that bad early on (which is to be expected with an overly complex design from Europe) then you can easily guess how it's going to be at 100k, 150k, or beyond. Good luck.
No, fuel economy isn't slightly better. EPA cert only pegged it at 1 MPG better, but in the real world guys are finding that it's worse, which is typical of small turbo engines. Check out Getty's Garage....he's tested them all and the Hurricane is at the bottom of the list.
Not really, especially if the engine is built for that power and the application.540 > 395
It is really that simple if you want to 'guess' at what a motor might do over time.
not sure at all what that meansNot really, especially if the engine is built for that power and the application.
not sure at all what that means
No, not at all. My comment was the only non-subjective piece of this discussion is that the I6TT HO makes insanely more power than the V8. Everything else is speculation.Your comment seems like it suggests a engine that makes a lot of power will have shorter longevity. My comment was if the engine is built correctly, it'll last as long as a less powerful engine
1: I never had to change a water pump on any car or truck I owned, and I keep most of them for 100k+ milesWell we've already seen:
- 14 hours of labor to change a simple water pump (!)
- Exhaust routing on some models won't even allow for transmission fluid/filter changes, which means people just won't do it, which means shorter trans life
- Timing jobs are a nightmare
- Electrical issues galore
I mean, go over to the Wagoneer forum and click on the "problems/issues/TSBs" section. HOURS and HOURS of reading. It's a disaster. That vehicle (based on Ram 1500 largely) got the engine first.
So yeah, if it's that bad early on (which is to be expected with an overly complex design from Europe) then you can easily guess how it's going to be at 100k, 150k, or beyond. Good luck.
No, fuel economy isn't slightly better. EPA cert only pegged it at 1 MPG better, but in the real world guys are finding that it's worse, which is typical of small turbo engines. Check out Getty's Garage....he's tested them all and the Hurricane is at the bottom of the list.
I prefer NA cars and trucks myself. But I also have and had a lot of cars with turbos. I never replaced a turbo on any car. Even my first car was an 1987 RX7 Turbo and I drove that to 165k miles before selling it to someone. I'm all for a V8 pickup, but I'm just tired of the tired old hemi that debuted in 2009 truck. It's time for a new and more powerful V8. Until then, my hurricane has plenty of power and I am going to assume reliability until it proves me wrong. So I am gonna give it the benefit of the doubt until something factual comes out that should concern me. So far, so good.i have to respond.
yeah, lot's of high mileage turbos' but they are not hurricanes......not bashing just speaking from my actual experience i have had turbo cars.
we went through this before diesel turbo yeah great! gasoline not so much.
according to google AI lol the highest mileage hurricane RAM has 44k on it.
it's a cliché but it hold's true "the light that burns twice a bright burns half as long" the new wave of turbo 2.0's and 1.5's 4 bangers won't hold up long term either they are not meant to, let's be clear the manufactures want you buy cars/trucks every few years they only care that it makes it past the warrantee. but 2026 RAM 10 year 100k is promising if they stay in business that much longer.
there are many hemi's with well over 200k and i'll eat humble pie if the hurricane get's anywhere near that point.
with millions of hemi's on the road yeah you have some hemi's with issues but percentage wise not huge even when you factor in e-torque.
i hope i'm wrong about the I-6, time will tell.
i am biased as a whole i am anti turbo no matter what I-6, V6, V8, 4 banger hell even 3 banger. NA all the way
I just purchased the 2025 1500 Tungsten about a month ago. I really like the power of the hurricane high output. Seems far more quicker than my 2013 1500 hemi 5.7 that I had. But I’m having a problem with my Tungsten’s instrument cluster. The odometer keeps resetting back to 634 miles after I shutdown the engine. I should be well over a 1,000 miles bye now. Took it in today, but didn’t have a loaner, but taking it back to dealer on Monday loaner or not.I’m a rookie so apologize in advance if this is a silly question. Looking to make a new purchase. Do I grab a 2025 with the 6 banger or do I build a 2026 with the v8 coming back? Any general consensus on here amongst the gang of which is better/preferred? Pros and cons of each? Thanks in advance.
20K on mine, no issues at all, just 540hp roaring down the road.I prefer NA cars and trucks myself. But I also have and had a lot of cars with turbos. I never replaced a turbo on any car. Even my first car was an 1987 RX7 Turbo and I drove that to 165k miles before selling it to someone. I'm all for a V8 pickup, but I'm just tired of the tired old hemi that debuted in 2009 truck. It's time for a new and more powerful V8. Until then, my hurricane has plenty of power and I am going to assume reliability until it proves me wrong. So I am gonna give it the benefit of the doubt until something factual comes out that should concern me. So far, so good.
First of all, a quick check of Autotrader shows 2 2025 Ram 1500's with the turbo and over 84,000 miles.i have to respond.
yeah, lot's of high mileage turbos' but they are not hurricanes......not bashing just speaking from my actual experience i have had turbo cars.
we went through this before diesel turbo yeah great! gasoline not so much.
according to google AI lol the highest mileage hurricane RAM has 44k on it.
it's a cliché but it hold's true "the light that burns twice a bright burns half as long" the new wave of turbo 2.0's and 1.5's 4 bangers won't hold up long term either they are not meant to, let's be clear the manufactures want you buy cars/trucks every few years they only care that it makes it past the warrantee. but 2026 RAM 10 year 100k is promising if they stay in business that much longer.
there are many hemi's with well over 200k and i'll eat humble pie if the hurricane get's anywhere near that point.
with millions of hemi's on the road yeah you have some hemi's with issues but percentage wise not huge even when you factor in e-torque.
i hope i'm wrong about the I-6, time will tell.
i am biased as a whole i am anti turbo no matter what I-6, V6, V8, 4 banger hell even 3 banger. NA all the way