RamBamRepeat
Active Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2020
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 3
- Age
- 37
Do not waste your time like I did trying to work out a buyback directly with FCA.
I’ve taken pride during this lifetime in never having been litigious, never even been to small claims court. However, after a couple months of FCA giving me the run around, for the first time in my life, I hired a lawyer for help.
While ignoring me for months, FCA all of a sudden developed ears and responded ASAP to the lemon law firm that they will buy back my lemon Ram Limited 4x4.
Even then, FCA doesn’t give a
about customer loyalty.
I’ve had many, about 20, Rams and Wranglers going back 25 plus years. Some model years have had more hiccups than others. I hung in there, went through the fixes. They just couldn’t fix the current Ram.
So now, several more months since FCA said they’d buy the lemon back, they still don’t have the paperwork together.
And, FCA has known the $800 yearly registration is due tomorrow for months.
They’ve been reminded of the yearly $800 DMV registration fee coming due via the lemon law attorney three times this month. FCA doesn’t care.
So, I sit here with a RAM truck that can’t really safely be driven, (it’s a fuel issue) the CA registration due tomorrow.
If DMV is not paid by 30 days from tomorrow, a 30 percent penalty is added to the $800.
If I non op it, then it will have to be flat bedded to the dealer, or face even higher DMV penalties if caught on the road driving it to the dealer, when FCA gets around to finally setting a turn in date.
The fuel issue is I can’t put fuel in it as you can’t get the gas station fuel nozzle to release for up to 30 minutes or so and gas flies out and all over during the battle to disconnect the fuel nozzle.
The Ram had several “redesigned and updated” fuel neck replacements and was in the shop multiple times adding up to 45 days plus sitting in service while I hoped the issue was finally fixed each time. I do love my Ram trucks after all.
I have no issue with my dealer service advisor or the dealer techs. They did/do their all with what FCA gives them for “new designed” parts and with what the Star case team tells them to do for corrections/fixes.
Huge Mopar guy here since childhood. They’re in my blood!
So now, the Ram has been sitting with a near empty tank in my yard for months. Just enough fuel to get it back to the dealer for turn in.
Understanding crap happens, and once again being a lifelong Mopar guy, I asked if FCA would throw a bone, maybe a couple hundred bucks off incentive to me to stay with the brand and buy another FCA product.
You know how FCA randomly sends out those $500 off cards, in addition to what you negotiate with a dealer, in the mail over the years? Anyway, from FCA, F U, nope. FCA also has no interest in just sending me a like replacement truck.
I’m a big boy, this isn’t whining, just sharing my experience so others with FCA lemons get on it with a lawyer involved quicker than I did for a resolve that takes, well, in my case, up to 8 months so far.
What I also didn’t know about lemon law, at least in CA, is that the vehicle manufacturer pays your attorney fees.
In terms of buyback, at least in CA, it’s your purchase price back plus taxes, less an amount for the miles you drove pre the first complaint about a repeat issue.
Lemon law also pertains to a used vehicle you may have purchased as long as it is still under factory warranty. I had no idea about that either.
So, if you take a new vehicle in at 900 miles for what becomes a repeat issue, 900 miles of mileage use is deducted. If you have the issue at 900 miles but wait to take it in until 5k miles, then 5k miles of “trouble free miles” is deducted. Go in sooner than later!
Say you buy a used vehicle, but under factory warranty, with 5000 miles on it. You first take it in for what ends up being a repeat lemon problem at 5300 miles. Though you’ve only driven it 300 miles, 5300 miles of “no trouble use” will be deducted. This is where you get totally screwed if the prior owner just opted to dump their lemon on a lot and thus the next unsuspecting buyer gets this brunt of charge back of the prior owners miles.
The prior owner takes the hit on their trade in value to just get rid of it instead of going through the lemon law process. The next buyer then takes further hits for miles they didn’t even drive when they get entangled in the mess as the next owner. But, on the plus, at least lemon law does still give that next buyer some recourse.
This all based on what I’ve learned going through the lemon law based on California’s version of it.
Any vehicle you Google with lemon attached to it will bring up examples.
I get that. It’s the FU timeline from FCA that is really turning me off from a lifelong infatuation with Jeep and Ram.
I already told the dealer to resell a replacement I’d ordered that just came in this week since FCA corporate can’t and doesn’t care to get off the pot.
The Ram is paid for so no complicated formula of payments or lease numbers for FCA to figure out, just purchase price plus tax, less mileage use up to the first time the Ram went in for the problem. Yet, again, many months later since they told the lemon law firm they’d buy it back and nothing.
Hope all this helps you or someone you know in cutting to the lemon law buyback chase with FCA quicker if you have an FCA lemon now or end up with one down the road.
I’ve taken pride during this lifetime in never having been litigious, never even been to small claims court. However, after a couple months of FCA giving me the run around, for the first time in my life, I hired a lawyer for help.
While ignoring me for months, FCA all of a sudden developed ears and responded ASAP to the lemon law firm that they will buy back my lemon Ram Limited 4x4.
Even then, FCA doesn’t give a

I’ve had many, about 20, Rams and Wranglers going back 25 plus years. Some model years have had more hiccups than others. I hung in there, went through the fixes. They just couldn’t fix the current Ram.
So now, several more months since FCA said they’d buy the lemon back, they still don’t have the paperwork together.
And, FCA has known the $800 yearly registration is due tomorrow for months.
They’ve been reminded of the yearly $800 DMV registration fee coming due via the lemon law attorney three times this month. FCA doesn’t care.
So, I sit here with a RAM truck that can’t really safely be driven, (it’s a fuel issue) the CA registration due tomorrow.
If DMV is not paid by 30 days from tomorrow, a 30 percent penalty is added to the $800.
If I non op it, then it will have to be flat bedded to the dealer, or face even higher DMV penalties if caught on the road driving it to the dealer, when FCA gets around to finally setting a turn in date.
The fuel issue is I can’t put fuel in it as you can’t get the gas station fuel nozzle to release for up to 30 minutes or so and gas flies out and all over during the battle to disconnect the fuel nozzle.
The Ram had several “redesigned and updated” fuel neck replacements and was in the shop multiple times adding up to 45 days plus sitting in service while I hoped the issue was finally fixed each time. I do love my Ram trucks after all.
I have no issue with my dealer service advisor or the dealer techs. They did/do their all with what FCA gives them for “new designed” parts and with what the Star case team tells them to do for corrections/fixes.
Huge Mopar guy here since childhood. They’re in my blood!
So now, the Ram has been sitting with a near empty tank in my yard for months. Just enough fuel to get it back to the dealer for turn in.
Understanding crap happens, and once again being a lifelong Mopar guy, I asked if FCA would throw a bone, maybe a couple hundred bucks off incentive to me to stay with the brand and buy another FCA product.
You know how FCA randomly sends out those $500 off cards, in addition to what you negotiate with a dealer, in the mail over the years? Anyway, from FCA, F U, nope. FCA also has no interest in just sending me a like replacement truck.
I’m a big boy, this isn’t whining, just sharing my experience so others with FCA lemons get on it with a lawyer involved quicker than I did for a resolve that takes, well, in my case, up to 8 months so far.
What I also didn’t know about lemon law, at least in CA, is that the vehicle manufacturer pays your attorney fees.
In terms of buyback, at least in CA, it’s your purchase price back plus taxes, less an amount for the miles you drove pre the first complaint about a repeat issue.
Lemon law also pertains to a used vehicle you may have purchased as long as it is still under factory warranty. I had no idea about that either.
So, if you take a new vehicle in at 900 miles for what becomes a repeat issue, 900 miles of mileage use is deducted. If you have the issue at 900 miles but wait to take it in until 5k miles, then 5k miles of “trouble free miles” is deducted. Go in sooner than later!
Say you buy a used vehicle, but under factory warranty, with 5000 miles on it. You first take it in for what ends up being a repeat lemon problem at 5300 miles. Though you’ve only driven it 300 miles, 5300 miles of “no trouble use” will be deducted. This is where you get totally screwed if the prior owner just opted to dump their lemon on a lot and thus the next unsuspecting buyer gets this brunt of charge back of the prior owners miles.
The prior owner takes the hit on their trade in value to just get rid of it instead of going through the lemon law process. The next buyer then takes further hits for miles they didn’t even drive when they get entangled in the mess as the next owner. But, on the plus, at least lemon law does still give that next buyer some recourse.
This all based on what I’ve learned going through the lemon law based on California’s version of it.
Any vehicle you Google with lemon attached to it will bring up examples.
I get that. It’s the FU timeline from FCA that is really turning me off from a lifelong infatuation with Jeep and Ram.
I already told the dealer to resell a replacement I’d ordered that just came in this week since FCA corporate can’t and doesn’t care to get off the pot.
The Ram is paid for so no complicated formula of payments or lease numbers for FCA to figure out, just purchase price plus tax, less mileage use up to the first time the Ram went in for the problem. Yet, again, many months later since they told the lemon law firm they’d buy it back and nothing.
Hope all this helps you or someone you know in cutting to the lemon law buyback chase with FCA quicker if you have an FCA lemon now or end up with one down the road.
Last edited: