I did some informal research on Carmax. Adjusted for roughly the same equipment (I used pano roof as the filter to try to make sure we were comparing roughly equivalent well loaded trucks) and the limited trim does generally cost anywhere from 3-4k more than a comparable Laramie. There are some outliers on both sides, so to speak, for trucks with exceptionally low or high mileage etc. Given the typical difference in pricing when new, it is unclear whether the lower trim depreciates more quickly as someone seems to assert with fervor, or whether the typical price difference between a Laramie and limited is maintained (roughly speaking, adjusting for age, mileage, and regional variations in demand). That would take digging into original sticker price and looking closely at other desirable options like the 33 gallon tank, tow package, etc.
I do question why Ram allows you to option up the lower trims to the point where they can actually exceed the equipment level of a higher trim truck. That seems somewhat illogical, but may make comparison shopping across dealers more difficult, an obvious advantage to Ram dealers. (For example, I found a very nice Bighorn trim with a pano roof and all kinds of toys - nice truck, but an unusual configuration for a Big Horn.). That being said, it seems like at least some people here place a really great emphasis on trim level, and that is fine because that represents a portion of the market, and Ram wants to appeal to those customers as well. So for those folks, if one truck has the equipment they want but it isn’t a limited, it is a no sale. Different strokes for different folks. For me, when buying a new truck, I look at the equipment I want and go from there; the trim level only matters insofar as whether it has what I want or don‘t want. And when buying a used truck, it’s not as if I do not consider equipment, but the first consideration is condition and service records because when you buy a three or four year old vehicle, there may very well be a reason it is available.
One final note on resale: the value of all these trucks from the big three continue to be high on the used market (although my spam inbox is routinely filled with incentives on the new trucks for all of the big three - likely due to a slower economy and the higher cost of money). The family construction business has been buying pickups for several decades now and anecdotally at least I think we are still dealing with lingering pandemic era pricing in the used market, although it seems to be coming back into line as shortages ease. So I would not draw too much, in terms of analyzing depreciation, from the last four years or so. Vehicles of all kinds have historically been pretty bad in terms of depreciation, and in my opinion the smart people (like those surveyed in the Millionaire Next Door many years ago) buy vehicles and keep them for a relatively long period of time so as to avoid repeating the financially punishing effects of depreciation. This is why reliability is really critical, because poor reliability will almost force you to buy a new vehicle, as who has time for all the nonsense of going back and forth to the dealer. This is why I would hypothesize the Toyota trucks and SUVs have such high resale, even though in many instances they are less desirable from an modernity, trim, and equipment perspective.
Merry Christmas everyone.