SD Rebel
Spends too much time on here
I would love to see a V8 hemi back in 1500. Better yet, a 6.4 than a 5.7. I’d much rather have a large displacement naturally aspirated engine in a truck than a highly strung small displacement turbocharged engine. Get rid of pointless etorque and the start stop system. It saves absolutely minimal amount of fuel and is not at all financially viable. It costs more money to build it than it would save on fuel over 250k miles.
The current 3.0 twin turbo hurricane is great on paper but it is way over stressed already. If look at the quick back of the napkin calculation it makes 420/3 =140 hp per liter. This is way more than Fords ecoboost or GMs 2.7 4 cylinder mill. The HO version is even more stressed 540/3=180 hp per liter. If you plan on making any sort of modding or tuning, there is pretty much no safety margin left , it will not last long. Let’s see how long will the bearings, seals and gaskets last on those hurricanes.
The Ecoboost 3.5L makes 400 hp / 500 lb-ft, while the Hurricane S.O. makes 420 hp / 469 lb-ft. The difference is 20 hp more for the Hurricane, but 31 lb-ft more torque for the Ford. In terms of engine wear, I read that higher torque has more effect on engine wear over time than higher hp. That would be 156 lb-ft per liter for the Hurricane and 143 lb-ft per liter for the Ford. That's only about a 9% difference. Factor in the Hurricane has a more naturally balanced inline configuration.
In the end, I would be more concerned about the quality of the turbochargers used, how they are cooled and their durability over the engine itself. If I was to choose between the Ford 3.5L, Hurricane 3.0L or the Toyota 3.5L, all six banger twin turbos, I would prefer the Hurricane. This is assuming they fixed all the misfire bugs it's currently enjoying.