I’m certain we are not talking about a few missed or late payments. I’m sure this would be activated in a case of severe delinquency. If someone buys a vehicle with a loan, and stops making payments, there has to be a reasonable timeframe when the lender can do anything in their power to get THEIR vehicle back. Just because the lender took the chance doesn’t give the buyer the right to keep the vehicle forever without paying for it. Now the question is, what is reasonable? I’m sure that is clearly written in the contract that the buyer signs (i.e. agrees to because they signed). I agree that the automated shutdown feature is a little big brother-ish, but if that is what it takes for lenders to get, what I would consider a stolen vehicle, back from the “renter”, so be it. I say renter because the “buyer“ stoped making payments. Not paid off, not your vehicle. I’m sure there would be a lot to it. Is the vehicle parked in an area where it would be accessible to repo? Is it safe to do so? I would assume the repo company would have to follow the vehicle to a public place where it would be easily picked up at a later time due to the buyer abandoning it because it won’t start (they will know why). This would make repos much safer as opposed to doing it with the buyer around. Now, after the vehicle is paid off and it’s yours, that’s when I would have a problem with someone having the ability to disable the vehicle. But, hasn’t On-Star had that ability for ages in Cadillacs and other vehicles?