‘19ramlveryeha
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2019
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 224
- Points
- 43
- Age
- 44
We just came home from a vacation in Maine, traveling about 425 miles in total. My Rebel eclipsed 2K miles on the trip, and we encountered highway speeds of 70-80 MPH, a lot of stop and go traffic (getting thru Boston, accidents, and leading up to tolls on I-95) and drives down country roads. The full gamut of driving conditions. I tend to have a heavy foot. The trip computer calculated our average MPG to be 16.9, which is right at the 17 Combined from the EPA, and I have no reason to suspect the computer was off measurably.
A few more observations... the truck loves back roads/secondary roads between 40 and 55 where I routinely see 22MPG+ the entire stretch and "ECO" mode is always on. As you'd expect idling and traffic kill the trucks numbers... I can see how e-Torque could pay big dividends there. Speeds over 70 drag down the trucks MPG numbers too... as you approach and exceed 2000 RPM my Rebel's efficiency suffers proportionally.
Lastly, it seems as though cruise control has a heavy foot as well, using more throttle input than it needs. Not sure if there's a way to test this "scientifically", but I felt as though I could keep the truck at 75 with much less throttle input, and therefore better fuel economy, than cruise would. I'm not talking about "hyper-miling". It is what it is... I use cruise a lot and still will... but it's something I noticed. Anyone else see this?
I’ve noticed the same about cruise control. I’ve stopped using it for Thai reason. I have better control with the ol toe.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk