jdmartin
Ram Guru
I just used the Miata/Kia as an example of more gears doesn't necessarily equal better. I've heard from others who have the 5 speed manual version of my Kia 6 speed, same engine, that it's a lot more fun to drive than my 6 speed. I don't have any direct experience so I can't say. Just as I can't say the 5.7 is better or worse with more gears. I suspect it's better, but I haven't had a Chrysler product since my '78 Dodge Colt which was a Mitsubishi anyway .Well I could be wrong, but to me it's simple; more gears = more opportunity to put the power right at the sweet spot of the engine. You can't use the miata and kia and titan in this discussion because you're comparing different engines, not the same engine with more or less gears.
The reason why CVT's are so good on paper is the same reason; keep that power optimized and reving right where it needs to be. The more gears you add, the more it approaches the CVT idea.
Yes we agree really good tuning is required, but that's the same for a 4 speed as well. So given proper tuning, a 10 speed will always give you the better options than the same truck/engine with a 4 speed. In worst case, it can skip gears (some transmissions don't use 1, but start off from 2 from a stand still, unless you drop it into sport mode), in best case, it will use all 10 gears and will always have an optimum gear for every mph, rpm, and load.
Mostly what I was trying to say is that it should cost more money to correctly set up an 8 speed transmission, from beginning to end, than it does a 5 speed (or 4 speed, if you like) just by virtue of having the ability to fine-tune everything, versus the lumping that occurs with less gears, and that it sounds like FCA could have improved that tuning but likely didn't because it's a cost issue. As for me, I'm pretty happy with the transmission the way it is since I tend to drive more like Grandpa than Racer Joe these days anyway