If we take the "sluggish" response aspect of the 3.21 vs 3.92 out of the equation , we can look at it from a strictly math/cost per mpg perspective.
Assumptions: 23g tank. 3.21 @17mpg vs 3.92 at 15mpg
Average miles/tank: 3.21 at 391miles/tank vs 3.92 at 345miles/tank
Decreased difference of 46miles of driving/tank
Or, about a dollar a day difference in cost between the 3.21 and 3.92.
Man the amount of forum posts and threads on this subject of gearing is mind-blowing. I have enjoyed the 3.92 gears for the sheer fun of driving it and will occasionally tow a snowmobile trailer. It is also what came on my truck. So, being transparent, If it came with a 3.21, that is what I would have ended up with. I probably still would have been very happy.
Everyone drives a different route, different pedal response, etc. We are all comparing apples and oranges. "EPA estimated" is a joke anyway, the EPA doesn't do the testing, they just say how to do the test. Who drives at 55 mph on the highway? Not me...if the highway speed is 55, I go 64 mph. We have a section of highway here that is 75 mph, I go 84 mph and my gas mileage is horrible there. But, I get to camp faster.
Anyway, this topic won't go away, but I think everyone should throttle down on the "poor gas mileage" talk and understand you are buying a Hemi V8 for the impact it makes. If you were looking for a truck with good gas mileage, you should probably have shopped elsewhere. I know why my gas mileage is bad, because I love to jump on it from light to light, down any straightaway, etc. I also think it will improve slightly over time, once we get back into summer gas blend, etc. But, my style of driving probably won't change much.
Not trying to be disrespectful to the audience, but just my 2 cents...or more like my $1 a day. Be happy the guy next to at the light is scared...