Sounds like he polluted the stream, and there was enough evidence to charge. Plastic and metal bits that may have fallen off during the jump are pollution, too.Mike says that he was invited onto private property to film these videos and does not believe that he was destructive to the environment, nor did his vehicle leak anything into the stream which could be poisonous to fish (a reference to the "Pollution of Waters" charge). Regardless, he also says that PFBC indicated that it had walked the stream and was able to determine that there was enough evidence for the charges, but the YouTuber says that the commission should instead be questioning the property owners or those who live around it.
'm not defending the guy here, but think about what you posted. Plastic and metal parts falling off during the jump? He wasn't jumping a Ford! There were no parts falling off when he initiated the jump. All damage came when he landed.Sounds like he polluted the stream, and there was enough evidence to charge. Plastic and metal bits that may have fallen off during the jump are pollution, too.
Lol don't tell me to "think about what I posted" then reply with a bunch of speculative nonsense. I don't know exactly what happened - what fell off or leaked from the truck - and neither do you. When you're dealing with watershed & wetlands law, public vs. private ownership does not always matter.'m not defending the guy here, but think about what you posted.
His charges include various violations of specific verbiage within Title 30, including two counts of Disturbance of Waterways and Watersheds, six counts of Pollution of Waters, six counts of Littering, and four counts of Misuse of Property and Waters.
If he ruptured/broke the shock reservoir then there is a good chance he lost some fluid. An if so, that in and of itself constitutes a chemical/oil spill, whether on public or private land. If he disturbed a waterway on private land that flows into a public waterway, then he may very well have a problem with polluting a public waterway. Depending on what the designation of the land is riparian habitat, watershed, etc., even on private land, it can be a big problem. Not to mention all the lesser beings further down the food chain that will think they can go out in the wet and wild and do stupid cr@p like this and leave their mark for all to see. Always love to go out into a beautiful meadow and find that some moron with a 4x4 and big tires "left his mark" for the rest of us to see, or not. The world is full of stupid people and they don't need this s%!*$#@d giving them ideas. Ahhhh for the days of lions and tigers and bears and natural selection.'m not defending the guy here, but think about what you posted. Plastic and metal parts falling off during the jump? He wasn't jumping a Ford! There were no parts falling off when he initiated the jump. All damage came when he landed.
Also, they say he polluted the waterway, but the truck wasn't leaking any fluids, so what did he pollute it with? They said the pollutants were of a chemical nature. Again, what chemicals were found? Are they even used in the truck? If so, they need to prove that those specific chemicals were leaking. He drove that truck quite a bit after the jump, so it couldn't have been leaking too much of anything. Anything that fell out of the truck or broke when he landed, were all on private property, so they can't say he littered either.
A jump cycle consists of a run-up, launch, flight, and landing. The damage occurred during the landing of the jump cycle. You were correct in saying that parts were unlikely to fall off during the flight-time. I was correct in saying that the damage occurred during the jump, at landing. Otherwise it's basically arguing semantics, and that's dumb.You guys need to read what I wrote. Jimchi said that plastic and metal parts fell off during the jump. Parts don't just fall off a new truck. They fell off after he landed, due to the impact, but the jump was over at that point, so he did not pollute during the jump. That's all I was saying about your comment.
Sounds like no “I’ll intent”, but also claimed ignorance which isn’t a defense. Sorry dumbass, claiming to care, but ignorance isn’t a good defense. For those of us that responsibly off road, crap like this ruins it for us.
If Street Speed 717 (Mike Hyssong) were to read this thread, he'd be happier than a pig in mud. Anything to drive more views of his asinine videos makes him happy. More views =more $.The guy is a moron and an as*****. Totally deserves it for his stupidity, regardless of the charge. Watch his videos and you'll see why. He's literally cringe like wtf.
He's not the only person with money around here, I could care less. Karma will come around to him; that or the EPA or some other authority.If Street Speed 717 (Mike Hyssong) were to read this thread, he'd be happier than a pig in mud. Anything to drive more views of his asinine videos makes him happy. More views =more $.