5thGenRams Forums

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is the term "grocery getter" offensive to you

Do you find the term "grocery getter" offensive

  • I find it quite/very offensive

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It bothers me somewhat

    Votes: 1 2.1%
  • Doesn't bother me at all

    Votes: 36 76.6%
  • I own one and I'm proud of it

    Votes: 4 8.5%
  • Tacos

    Votes: 6 12.8%

  • Total voters
    47

silver billet

Spends too much time on here
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,869
Reaction score
2,809
Points
113
Genuinely curious, how many of us find the term "grocery getter" offensive when used to describe our 5th gen rams. If you haven't heard the phrase, it's used to describe a truck that does only light passenger duty chores; driving back and forth to work, pick up kids from school, getting groceries (hence the term) etc.

Descriptive phrases for other use cases might be:
mall crawler (looks like it could rock crawl but never goes off road)
tow pig (mainly used to tow)
snot rocket (its used for ferrying young kids)
etc

Any of these bother you, please cast your vote and post your thoughts below.
 
While my Rebel is my daily driver (grocery getter is as good a term as any), I do on occasion have need for a truck. Also need something with either AWD or 4WD for the winter.

Sure, the Rebel is really in the off-road class, doubt it will see anything tougher than an 1/8 mile of rutted gravel driveway. Hauls lumber, other materials, and sometimes garbage. Occasionally pulls a trailer. Nice ride on long trips. And no problem in grocery store parking lots.

For nice days and destinations which do not have high risk of door dings, I have this in the garage:

IMG_2987.jpeg

6.4 liter Scat Pack with 6-speed manual transmission. Wonderful on the back roads, not fun rowing down the avenue.
 
Last edited:
Grocery Getter = driving miles off the pavement to haul out a moose, elk or deer. What could be offensive about that? I’m just itching to do a caribou hunt. Lots of off road miles there. [/sarc]

Seriously, my truck is not a pavement princess, but much of its life is spent on around town errands including the actual grocery store. We do like to get it off road from time to time to hunt and explore.
 
Offensive no…

Call it what you want you want especially when you’re the one that either paying or paid for it.

Not everyone that buys a truck does so with the pure intention of off-roading it or throwing cedar blocks in the bed on a daily basis.

Just like most how most guys will buy muscle or sports yet never take them on the track.. instead they get driven stop light to stop light.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Are we talking about the term “grocery getter” being used for trucks, or for wives? My vote will change depending on the response.
Actually, it won’t change either way.

I see you like to live dangerously... or not at all if she reads the forums...
 
It's one of it's jobs of course, but too many people see you do one thing and imagine that's all you do with it.

This is true. I've been called out for "hauling air" most of the time 🤷‍♂️

Greenies. They want me to buy an EV and rent a truck when I need one. Not a chance.
 
This is true. I've been called out for "hauling air" most of the time 🤷‍♂️

Greenies. They want me to buy an EV and rent a truck when I need one. Not a chance.
About 20 years ago, I ran a set of "green" calculations against my 2500 Yukon XL with the 8,6 liter engine. If I had a second car to use when I did not need the "big" rig, my carbon footprint was actually higher than using the Yukon for groceries.

I have usually had two vehicles, a truck and a car (both "dailies," not considering my current toy). I have saved a lot of money with that model as I can do almost all maintenance and repairs myself, it is not a "green" solution though.

If I did not have a truck, I could use delivery services. These are trucks which are clearly commercial (bordering on real big rig). Maybe fine, but 5 mpg on diesel in town is not very green either.

There are some areas where green calculations come out positive and save money. One example is the period of time where refrigerators fell apart after about five years, but were getting more efficient all the time. When considering operating costs (electricity), there was a 20 year period where it was less expensive to replace every 5 years than to repair; those were the "planned obsolescence" years.

In most cases, following your pocket book and life needs do not have a bad outcome, EVs will not make sense until we have reliable scaled electricity not coming from fossil fuels. As long as power still comes from coal, oil, or LNG, the polution just moves geographically. In another 30 years, fusion will likely change the equation in favor of EVs. Not just economically and in terms of convenience, but in actual "greenness."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top