Long story short, my 2022 1500 Eco Diesel has been in the dealer twice, once at around 500 miles on the ODO and now at around 11,000, same issue, car stalled, first time they replaced the fuel pump, now the whole fuel system. Not sure if dirty diesel, but between both times the car was in the shop total over 2 months in the first 10 months of ownership. Fast forward to a few days ago, dealing with customer service from FCA, they are now willing to repurchase the car vs replace it. Lady from FCA wrote the following:
"Thank you for sending some of the documents and I have read through your email. As I explained in our phone conversation, this is a repurchase of your vehicle, not a replacement, FCA does not offer replacements in MT(or LA). My team processes the buyback using the required documentation from the purchase of the vehicle, following the lemon law guidelines, we do not have any involvement in the purchase of your next vehicle, the only thing I can offer you in addition to the repurchase offer is a CDI, this is a corporate discount voucher that gives 3-5% off of invoice pricing on your next new purchase(in addition to any rebates you are eligible for). "
The car with issues I bought from Mark Dodge at their EP pricing, an almost fully loaded 2022 Limited sticker was 79,395, ended up paying 69,277 plus fees. I had Mark Dodge build me the same car for 2023, identical build, now the MSRP is 85,235 and not to mention the rebates I got which were 2,750 in total.
So general thought question, outside of the massive inconveniences of getting stranded, why should I be out of luck by now going to buy the same direct build and pay around 6k more due to a manufacturing defect? Also with their repurchase deal, I haven't seen any numbers, but she will come up with some deduction for mileage etc. Is this a time to get a hold of an attorney, or no point as she keeps talking about MT not being an replacement state for lemon law.
As to her 3-5% off, I doubt that is any better than what we pay at Mark Dodge.
I appreciate any feedback or if anyone had a similar situation.
"Thank you for sending some of the documents and I have read through your email. As I explained in our phone conversation, this is a repurchase of your vehicle, not a replacement, FCA does not offer replacements in MT(or LA). My team processes the buyback using the required documentation from the purchase of the vehicle, following the lemon law guidelines, we do not have any involvement in the purchase of your next vehicle, the only thing I can offer you in addition to the repurchase offer is a CDI, this is a corporate discount voucher that gives 3-5% off of invoice pricing on your next new purchase(in addition to any rebates you are eligible for). "
The car with issues I bought from Mark Dodge at their EP pricing, an almost fully loaded 2022 Limited sticker was 79,395, ended up paying 69,277 plus fees. I had Mark Dodge build me the same car for 2023, identical build, now the MSRP is 85,235 and not to mention the rebates I got which were 2,750 in total.
So general thought question, outside of the massive inconveniences of getting stranded, why should I be out of luck by now going to buy the same direct build and pay around 6k more due to a manufacturing defect? Also with their repurchase deal, I haven't seen any numbers, but she will come up with some deduction for mileage etc. Is this a time to get a hold of an attorney, or no point as she keeps talking about MT not being an replacement state for lemon law.
As to her 3-5% off, I doubt that is any better than what we pay at Mark Dodge.
I appreciate any feedback or if anyone had a similar situation.