Dusty1948
Ram Guru
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2018
- Messages
- 1,251
- Reaction score
- 851
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 76
- Location
- Rochester, New York
"...I prefer to keep Ram's feet in the fire to push them into better powertrains, we can't do that by pretending it's all sunshine and roses in the Ram because that really is their weak spot."GregHBNA, agreed that the the 3.6 pentastar is a great engine. I'd put it near the top of "regular/workhorse" motors. And also agree it doesn't belong with the 3.21 in the Ram.
But GM's 4.3 and turbo i4 work much better. I too have driven them, and it's not really a competition between those and the 3.6. They're still not hemi's, but they make much torque, and in the case of the i4 they make it really low down. You can say "it sucks", but compared to what. The Hemi? Ok... Compared to any other base engine in a truck from Ford/Ram? Nope. The i4 is a replacement for the 4.3, not the 5.3, and viewed in that light it does an amazing job for all those people who buy trucks to be used as "big passenger cars". You're not going to tow a 30 foot TT, but they're base engines. The 5.3 and the 6.2 and the 3.0 diesel cover towing.
Let's face it; I love my Ram, but the GM twins have better power train options all around. We need something to match the 6.2 v8 and 3.5 ecoboost, there is nothing. The 3.0 diesel is a strong performer, with much less lag and more power it seems than the 3rd gen ED. And the base engines (4.3 + turbo i4) are stronger than the 3.6.
Anyway, I'm rambling, but I prefer to keep Ram's feet in the fire to push them into better powertrains, we can't do that by pretending it's all sunshine and roses in the Ram because that really is their weakspot. (and my hemi ticks and clacks too much, at times I'm embarassed to drive it)
What you say is true, comparatively Rams powertrain selection is meager by todays competitive standards. Of course, up until very recently FCA'a financial position was grossly negative and I'm sure that had a limiting effect on engine development. Technically they have 6.1, 6.2, and 6.4 power plants that could be used, but with having to buy CAFE credits from other companies for the last ten I'm sure it negated their thoughts of packing one of those for a 1/2 ton.
This may surprise you but of all of the engines I've had from GM, Ford, Nissan and Toyota, the smoothest, quietest engine I ever owned was the 4.7 PowerTech I had in my '03 Dakota. It had gobs of low-end torque and power. After 140K + miles it still ran like a watch. I realize in a Ram they were somewhat lacking, especially in fuel mileage, but I still wonder what could've been done with that little motor.
The rumor(s) a little while ago was the plan for a Ram turbo charged inline six. As far as that goes, the current Pentastar motor was designed at the onset for turbo charging. So maybe somethings around the corner. Of course Ram engineers could go the other way and build bodies with aluminum.
Best regards,
Dusty
2019 Ram 1500 Billet Silver Laramie Quad Cab 2WD, 5.7 Hemi, 8HP75, 3.21 axle, 33 gallon fuel tank, factory dual exhaust, 18” wheels. Build date: 03 June 2018. Now at: 038843 miles.