Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I don't have one of these new Rams but saw this in another thread. There's a picture floating around here showing a cable near the top of the backside of the rear seat... on the driver's side IIRC. A few other pictures here show the seats folded down.
Serious question here, I promise I'm not trolling, but what parts of the country still need radar detectors?
I thought I've been noticing law enforcement allowing substantial speeds above posted limits before getting involved. It seems they use to get ya for more than about 5 mph over, but 10...
A quick disclaimer: there is no standardization, or requirement, or regulation as for how manufacturers implement TPMS systems. I mean, yes, some basic things like FCC requirements and rejection of signals from other vehicles have to be there, but the nuance of how TPMS operates, behaves...
It isn't obvious that the rear-seat backs fold down; nobody would know unless you own a Ram. To the casual observer the rear-seat back is permanently fixed in place. My thought was to somehow hang a pouch on the back of the seat and use that for stashing things.
EXACTLY. My gosh. If these people need to count pennies over the span of 100,000 miles, they probably need to re-consider if they should be buying a new vehicle at all.
Par for the course. Ford Legal seems to call a lot of shots, this commercial, and many nanny-state lockouts within their infotainment system that kill enjoyment and convenience. It's so bad that aftermarket hacking tools have been developed to help people defeat the dumbshit. Ford has forgotten...
Interesting, Jared. I appreciate your thoughtful approach. I wonder if Andre might bring his truck to run your loop, and vice-versa, your truck in Colorado on their loop. Might be an interesting addition for the upcoming article.
I think you pretty much got it. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but mostly the same functionality just bigger.
With that said, if you use navigation for actually navigating and viewing the road ahead... the difference is HUGE. As good as the 8.4" screen is, the fact that it's permanently in...
The looks alone don't cut the mustard. Monstrosity is a word that comes to mind. The mini bowtie offset to the drivers side is the cherry on this aesthetic disaster.
Let me get this out of the way: I agree moving to a bigger truck is the right way to increase payload.
With that said, I'm still curious about the design philosophy and what sort of margin is built into payload ratings. The authoritative answer, of course, can only come from someone within the...
Try turning off auto-zoom.
The built-in navigation is not bad at all once you figure it out and actually does some things better than Waze or GoogleMaps; like finding rest areas and some features of finding the next fuel stop. It does a perfectly fine job of finding routes for me, no issues...
There's a new video on Youtube with a guy claiming to have the 2nd Tundra with a million miles on it. He's an oilfield hotshotter so I don't doubt his mileage, but anyway, he stated his payload is 1,300 lbs but has hauled 3,000 lbs on a couple of occasions. He's still driving the truck so I...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.