kapinallinen2
Spends too much time on here
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
- Messages
- 2,387
- Reaction score
- 1,642
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 64
- Location
- Southern Maryland.
IMO the Rotopax do not hold enough fuel. Might be fine for a wrangler, a no go with my thirsty rebel.I wanted to revive this thread and ask if anyone has installed Rotopax in their beds and what configuration you would recommend.
I wanted to revive this thread and ask if anyone has installed Rotopax in their beds and what configuration you would recommend.
Diesel isn’t nearly as combustible as gas so the transfer tanks are difficult to find and expensive for gas. Just think of the liability of having 50 plus gallons of gas in the bed leaking out after a wreck. In our litigious society, its a gift for attorneys.Yes I have thought of a "drag up" tank. I have two issues, they are so permanent and these short 5'7" beds suck. My next one may be a 2500 Cummins with a 60 or 75 gallon transfer tank for sure. And the HD trucks payload can handle it.
Yep you are right. Transfer tanks are for diesel. Swapping to the larger 33 gal tank would make the most sense.Diesel isn’t nearly as combustible as gas so the transfer tanks are difficult to find and expensive for gas. Just think of the liability of having 50 plus gallons of gas in the bed leaking out after a wreck. In our litigious society, its a gift for attorneys.
The weight is an issue for 1500 owners as well.
I’d just put it off and get a diesel long bed, then the transfer tanks are difficult of 75-100 gallons.
33gallon is all you need tbh. that is, if you're worried about range when heading into the unknown.Yep you are right. Transfer tanks are for diesel. Swapping to the larger 33 gal tank would make the most sense.