Search results

Love the color as well. I just bought a Limited night edition in patriot blue.

I know it is not official, but when I was at the dealer last week I was told they just got word to expect the Ramcharger to be 9% over the comparable trim level gas engine.

This is pretty much why I just bought a 24' Limited the other day! I just built one as close to the one I just bought, and it is $89k compared to the $84k of the 24' I just bought (and with the current deals it was down to $69k). To go along with that, I definitely didn't want Ramboxes and the...

So you are saying you cannot get a 2025 Limited with 5'7" box and NO Ramboxes? If so, that's a big miss in my opinion.

The articles I have read so far say the Ramboxes are standard on the Tungsten but optional on all other trims.

How long have you had the Vararam on there? How did your mileage compare before and after that install?

I would say the worst part is, on the WAY to a trip somewhere, if the roads are crap, you show up at your destination ready to ride, and your sled is covered in crap! Yes, even with a cover on it. Not as bad, but the dirty salt water still leaks through.

Dang....lots of guys getting decent mileage. I’m not one of them! If I set the cruise at 60, I get 16.5-17, if I set the cruise at 73, I get 16.5-17.

I put on a set of 305/45/22 Hankook Dynapro AT2's (NOT the ATM's) and they seem to be pretty good so far. I haven't gotten the chance to use them in our nice MN winter yet obviously but we will see how they go! Also, I paid about $800 less than the equivalent size Ridge Grapplers......just FYI.

A very slight amount at full lock in reverse. I think once I take the time to pin point it, I can make it go away easy.

Kind of crap pics because of the sun, but here are a few.

I think you are correct, I'm pretty sure the ones above are referring to the ATM. A few things that drew me to them were they were offered in 305/45/22, they were relatively light weight at 47 lbs, and the tread depth was 16/32nds instead of 13/32nds. Well AND the fact they were $800 cheaper...

That’s my issue that drives me nuts. I can go on a FLAT road with the cruise set at 60 and I can’t get better than 17. In fact today, my 40 mile round trip on flat road at 60 was under 16.....no wind.

I don’t know what to say about mine, with 3.92’s no etorque, I get about 16-17 no matter what I do with the cruise set at 60 all the way up to 73. Doesn’t seem to matter the speed, I just get 16-17. In the last 9 years I’ve owned a 2011 F-150 3.5 eco, a 2014 Silverado LTZ 5.3, 2016 Ram Eco...

Just wondering if anyone else out there has tried these tires, and what their overall thoughts are? I put a set on my Limited and went a size bigger at 305/45/22 vs the stock 285/45/22's. So far they seem real nice, quiet on the highway and good wet grip. I have not had them on offroad...

Looks cool, but I think $6,500 for a front bumper kit is pretty much insane. And the full kit.....$11,000......

Never mind......just found a thread wher you have to go into your “display” settings and actually turn it on.....

Is there supposed to be an ECO light on all models that comes on? I have a Limited and have NEVER seen an ECO light.

There is no way FCA officially stated a half ton pickup truck with air suspension is not meant to be driven in cold climates. There would be a giant class action lawsuit by now.....

Sorry, I should have clarified, that is not mine, I haven't bought one yet. It's a picture off a web site selling them. I saw the pic and thought it could be concerning for the finish of the cover.