Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I agree with that's a good way to compare a to b but like you said, you have to drive slow and accelerate slowly to get published highway mpg. My dad probably could accomplish the ratings. I'm not a speed demon but I've only got published highway numbers a couple times and that was with my...
Take a look at the procedure the the epa uses to get those numbers. Their highway test isn't how we think it should be. It's really so far off reality, it's ridiculous.
I really like tfl truck but how they check gas mileage is not the most accurate. The epa does not check mileage this way. If the ram fuel tank allowed and extra .5 gallons and the Ford was short a half a gallon, that's almost a 4 mpg swing. I more accurate way would be a longer loop and weigh...
That would have been good. Even a 3.0 no turbo for the base engine would have satisfied most. It could have been good for 285 hp. They could have consolidated parts even more. Bye bye to the old pentastar. Lol
My 2014 Jeep gc 3.6 has 270,000 miles on it. The cam and lifters were replaced under the lifetime warranty. Original transmission too. The transmission has had a little jerk into 3rd for the last 20,000. We'll drive it till it's worth less than the repair.
Stellantis had to make a change and the Hurricane made sense to their overall platform of vehicles. They knew there would be a few people unhappy and and maybe a few of that small percentage would buy elsewhere. They also knew bringing a 540 hp truck to the market would bring people to ram. It...
Why is it so difficult to build a reliable engine? They engineer and test them to every extreme. Is it poor engineering, insufficient testing, poor manufacturing control or the bean counters? It's most likely all of the above. Next, if a company knows of an issue, why don't the fix it? Examples...
Just my opion.
Sorry, no difference refers to needing the proper engineering to handle the desired output and longevity.
Using the Cummins as an example, 25 years ago it had 160 hp and now, 420. That's with only a 15%ish increase in displacement. Technology improve every year To get us...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.